Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice
- PMID: 4067510
Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice
Abstract
An adjusting procedure was used to measure pigeons' preferences among alternatives that differed in the duration of a delay before reinforcement and of an intertrial interval (ITI) after reinforcement. In most conditions, a peck at a red key led to a fixed delay, followed by reinforcement, a fixed ITI, and then the beginning of the next trial. A peck at a green key led to an adjustable delay, reinforcement, and then the next trial began without an ITI. The purpose of the adjusting delay was to estimate an indifference point, or a delay that made a subject approximately indifferent between the two alternatives. As the ITI for the red key increased from 0 s to 60 s, the green-key delay at the indifference point increased systematically but only slightly. The fact that there was some increase showed that pigeons' choices were controlled by more than simply the delay to the next reinforcer. One interpretation of these results is that besides delay of reinforcement, rate of reinforcement also influenced choice. However, an analysis that ignored reinforcement rate, but considered the delays between a choice response and the reinforcers on subsequent trials, was able to account for most of the obtained increases in green-key delays. It was concluded that in this type of discrete-trial situation, rate of reinforcement exerts little control over choice behavior, and perhaps none at all.
Similar articles
-
Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1986 Apr;12(2):116-24. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1986. PMID: 3701262
-
Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):341-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985. PMID: 4020322 Free PMC article.
-
Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):63-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-63. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991. PMID: 2002302 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive impulsivity in animal models: role of response time and reinforcing rate in delay intolerance with two-choice operant tasks.Neuropharmacology. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(4-5):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.11.007. Epub 2009 Nov 27. Neuropharmacology. 2010. PMID: 19945469 Review.
-
Resolving the paradox of suboptimal choice.J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/xan0000085. Epub 2015 Dec 7. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016. PMID: 26640967 Review.
Cited by
-
Reassessing intertemporal choice: human decision-making is more optimal in a foraging task than in a self-control task.Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 6;6:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00095. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25774140 Free PMC article.
-
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986. PMID: 3746189 Free PMC article.
-
Operant hoarding: a new paradigm for the study of self-control.J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):247-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-247. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990. PMID: 2324665 Free PMC article.
-
Maximizing present value: A model to explain why moderate response rates obtain on variable-interval schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):331-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-331. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988. PMID: 16812543 Free PMC article.
-
Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):203-221. doi: 10.1037/xan0000199. Epub 2019 Mar 7. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019. PMID: 30843717 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials