Multiple forms of balancing selection maintain inversion polymorphism
- PMID: 40676258
- DOI: 10.1038/s41437-025-00780-y
Multiple forms of balancing selection maintain inversion polymorphism
Abstract
Despite many examples of balanced inversion polymorphisms, little is known about how they affect fitness-related traits. This knowledge gap hampers our understanding of how they are selectively maintained as protected polymorphisms. Here, we study the effects of a cosmopolitan balanced inversion polymorphism in D. melanogaster, In(3R)Payne, on fitness components, including traits related to development, growth, reproduction, stress resistance, and adult survival. We find that the non-inverted standard (STD) chromosomal arrangement and the inverted (INV) arrangement behave like Mendelian alleles of a supergene, which affect a suite of complex fitness-related phenotypes. While the STD arrangement tends to have positive, mostly dominant effects on size-related traits, fecundity, fertility, stress resistance, and lifespan, the INV arrangement exhibits mostly recessive effects that are indicative of fitness costs. Yet, in favor of the balanced polymorphism, we observe overdominance for egg hatchability, egg-to-adult survival, pupal survival at 18 °C, developmental time, and male desiccation resistance. The most parsimonious explanation for these heterotic effects is that they are due to some form of multi-locus heterokaryotype advantage. We also find several instances of trait-, sex-, and temperature-dependent changes in the degree of dominance, suggesting a possible role of antagonistic selection with context-specific dominance reversals in maintaining the polymorphism. Moreover, genotype-by-environment interactions and parental effects appear to contribute as well. Together, our results suggest that multiple phenotypic modes of balancing selection are involved in maintaining the inversion polymorphism.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval: All experiments were performed following the relevant guidelines and regulations.
References
-
- Anderson AR, Hoffmann AA, McKechnie SW, Umina PA, Weeks AR (2005) The latitudinal cline in the In(3R)Payne inversion polymorphism has shifted in the last 20 years in Australian Drosophila melanogaster populations. Mol Ecol 14:851–858. - PubMed
-
- Anderson AR, Collinge JE, Hoffmann AA, Kellett M, McKechnie SW (2003) Thermal tolerance trade-offs associated with the right arm of chromosome 3 and marked by the hsr-omega gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 90:195–202.
-
- Aulard S, David JR, Lemeunier F (2002) Chromosomal inversion polymorphism in Afrotropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res 79:49–63. - PubMed
-
- Bakker K (1962) An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Néerland Zool 14:200–281.
Grants and funding
- 310030_219283/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
- FZEB-0-214654/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
- 31003A-182262/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
- ALT 248-2018/European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous