PSA density correlates to pathology T stage and ISUP grade: insights from a cohort of 3568 radical prostatectomy cases
- PMID: 40676316
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05814-y
PSA density correlates to pathology T stage and ISUP grade: insights from a cohort of 3568 radical prostatectomy cases
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) is a valuable detection tool for prostate cancer (PCa) with PSA levels in the "gray zone" (4-10 ng/mL). However, its relationship with final pathology outcomes remains limited, especially on large cohorts.
Objective: This study aimed to describe PSAD distributions according to final pathology findings (pathological T stage and ISUP grade) and identify clinical and pathological factors influencing PSAD variations.
Methods: We analyzed a prospective cohort of 3568 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for PCa in our center between 2007 and 2025. PSAD was calculated using serum PSA (ng/mL) divided by prostate weight (g) from pathology reports. Associations between PSAD and pathology T stage, ISUP grade, total testosterone, cholesterol levels, and statin use were done using Spearman's correlation coefficient, stratified rank ANCOVA analysis and a multiple linear regression.
Results: The median PSAD was 0.17 ng/mL/g (IQR: 0.12-0.25). PSAD levels increased gradually with advanced pathology T stage (pT3a and T3b) and higher ISUP grade (p < 0.001 for both). After adjusting for confounding covariates (age and D'Amico risk classification), PSAD remained significantly associated with Pathology T stage and ISUP. Within the high-risk category, high biopsy ISUP and pathology ISUP grades were associated with lower PSAD levels (r = -0.59 and - 0.49 respectively). PSAD levels were associated with four adverse pathology outcomes, namely positive surgical margins, nodal involvement, ISUP ≥ 4 upgrading and pT ≥ 3 upstaging. Multivariate analysis identified higher biopsy ISUP grade and PSA levels as positive predictors of PSAD, while age, BMI, and testosterone were negatively associated.
Conclusion: PSAD correlates with PCa aggressiveness on pathology, making it a clinically relevant biomarker. Future studies should investigate PSAD's relation with adverse oncological outcomes, including biochemical recurrence.
Keywords: Biomarkers; ISUP grade; PSA density; Pathological staging; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Risk stratification.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: All patients gave informed consent, the study was approved by the Foch hospital ethics committee (IRB00012437). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the Safety of Delaying Surgery Beyond 9 Months in Localized Prostate Cancer Patients: Results From a Prospective Study With Propensity Score Matching.Int J Urol. 2025 Sep;32(9):1243-1249. doi: 10.1111/iju.70142. Epub 2025 Jun 4. Int J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40462596 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic Effects of Omitting Systematic Biopsies in Prostate Cancer Screening.Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Apr;8(2):435-443. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.002. Epub 2024 Oct 23. Eur Urol Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39443223 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Apr;7(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 26. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 37640584
-
Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in bone metastatic prostate cancer stratified by disease characteristics: A SEER-based retrospective analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 27;20(6):e0326429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326429. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40577265 Free PMC article.
-
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):467-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24321502
References
-
- Jue JS et al (2017) Re-examining prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density: defining the optimal PSA range and patients for using PSA density to predict prostate cancer using extended template biopsy. Urology 105:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.015 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Catalona WJ et al (2000) Comparison of percent free PSA, PSA density, and age-specific PSA cutoffs for prostate cancer detection and staging. Urology 56(2):255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00637-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Khalil S, Ibilibor C, Cammack J, De Riese W (2016) Association of prostate volume with incidence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer. RRU 8:201–205. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S117963 - DOI
-
- Rogosin S et al (2007) PSA density as a predictor of aggressive prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy. JCO 25(18):5007–5007. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.5007 - DOI
-
- Wang S et al (2024) Diagnostic performance of prostate-specific antigen density for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in the era of magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 7(2):189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.002 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous