Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985 Dec;26(12):1386-93.

Validation of radionuclide cardiac output measurements during exercise

  • PMID: 4067641
Free article
Comparative Study

Validation of radionuclide cardiac output measurements during exercise

J A Melin et al. J Nucl Med. 1985 Dec.
Free article

Erratum in

  • J Nucl Med 1987 Mar;28(3):401-2

Abstract

A nongeometric radionuclide technique with correction for attenuation was used for the determination of cardiac output and stroke volume during exercise in nine normal subjects and in ten hypertensive patients. Simultaneous reference stroke volume (range 48-159 ml) and cardiac output (range 3.6-23.8 l/min) measurements were obtained by the Fick method. Data were collected at rest and during 60 degrees upright exercise, at two or three levels of increasing severity. Three statistical measurements were used for the comparison of both methods: correlation, precision, and accuracy. Radionuclide and Fick cardiac output measurements (n = 67, rest and exercise data) correlated well (r = 0.90). For stroke volume, the correlation was less (r = 0.64); however, the precision or random variability of both methods was similar for stroke volume (radionuclide: 8 ml or 9%; Fick: 16 ml or 16%). The accuracy or systematic error was defined as the mean difference between radionuclide and Fick measurements. The radionuclide method underestimated the Fick measurements. The systematic error was 18 +/- 18 ml for stroke volume and 2.4 +/- 2.4 l/m for cardiac output. A similar comparison of both methods was made on the absolute changes of stroke volume (r = 0.61; range -19 + 70 ml) and cardiac output (r = 0.82; range +1.6 + 16.4 l/m) between rest and exercise. The precision of the two methods was similar; the systematic error was 1.9 +/- 2.2 l/m for cardiac output and 6 +/- 17 ml for stroke volume. Thus, in these two groups of patients, although radionuclide and Fick cardiac output measurements at rest and during exercise correlated well, the radionuclide values were systematically and significantly lower.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources