Extracorporeal therapy procedures (plasma exchange and immunoadsorption) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies (CIDP)- a database analysis
- PMID: 40676524
- PMCID: PMC12273229
- DOI: 10.1186/s12883-025-04294-2
Extracorporeal therapy procedures (plasma exchange and immunoadsorption) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies (CIDP)- a database analysis
Abstract
Background and objectives: There is limited study data on both therapeutic plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), mostly based on case series in patients in the early stages of the disease.
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the two therapy procedures in a larger sample with a longer duration of disease and immunomodulatory pre-treatment.
Methods: In this retrospective study from 5 centers in Germany, register data on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of therapy with IA or PE in patients with CIDP were examined. Treatment response was assessed using neurological scores (INCAT and Hughes Score), duration of hospital stay, and subjective assessment by examiners and patients. In addition, side effects were recorded.
Results: A total of 44 patients were analyzed, 23 treated with PE (mean age 61.3 years, 17 male, 6 female) and 21 with IA (mean age 67, 14 male, 7 female).
The mean duration of disease before treatment was 8.48±3.82 years (PE group) and 7.24±3.15 years (IA group). IA and PE showed a comparable treatment response. With IA, 11 out of 21 (52.4%) patients improved, whereas with PE, 14 out of 23 (60.9%) patients improved. The differences between before- and after-treatment INCAT and Hughes scores also showed an improvement with both PE and IA individually (INCAT 1.17±1.61 and 0.71±1.65, respectively, Hughes score 0.48±0.73 and 0.33±0.66, respectively), while there were no significant differences between the two groups. The patients in the IA group had a significantly shorter inpatient stay (p < 0.019). There was one adverse event in each group, but no serious adverse events in either group.
Discussion: This retrospective study indicates that IA and PE show comparable efficacy in chronic autoimmune neuropathies, including patients with longer disease duration and immunomodulatory pretreatment.
Keywords: chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, neurological autoimmune diseases, immunoadsorption, plasma exchange, treatment, INCAT score, Hughes score.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig (Approval Number: 409/29-lk). The entire study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Grimm A, Axer H. Chronisch immunvermittelte Neuropathien – Diagnostik und therapie. Fortschr Neurol · Psychiatr Juli. 2018;86(07):439–52. - PubMed
-
- Lehmann HC, Hartung HP, Hoerste GMZ, Kieseier BC. Plasma exchange in immune-mediated neuropathies. In: Bd. 21, Current opinion in neurology. Two commerce sq, 2001 market st, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008. p. 547–54. - PubMed
-
- Mausberg AK, Dorok M, Stettner M, Müller M, Hartung HP, Dehmel T. u. A. Recovery of the T-cell repertoire in CIDP by IV Immunoglobulins. Neurol 15 Januar. 2013;80(3):296–303. - PubMed
-
- Lewis RA, Muley SA. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Treatment and prognosis - UpToDate. Verfügbar unter: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/chronic-inflammatory-demyelinating-pol.... Zitiert 26 Feb 2024.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
