The Power of Words: Rebranding Euthanasia and Undermining Life's Sanctity
- PMID: 40677512
- PMCID: PMC12264241
- DOI: 10.1177/00243639251356676
The Power of Words: Rebranding Euthanasia and Undermining Life's Sanctity
Abstract
Language shapes ethical perceptions, profoundly influencing societal attitudes toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Historically condemned by Western medicine as a violation of life's sanctity, euthanasia has undergone a dramatic transformation through deliberate linguistic reframing. Euphemisms such as "death with dignity" and "medical aid in dying" align euthanasia with values of compassion, autonomy, and patient empowerment, often overshadowing its moral implications for human dignity. This article critically examines how these linguistic shifts have influenced the normalization of euthanasia; broadened eligibility criteria; and facilitated its legal acceptance across nations like the Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada. Engaging secular arguments from consequentialism and autonomy-based ethics reveals their limitations, particularly their disregard for moral intentionality, relational responsibilities, and the intrinsic worth of life. Drawing on Catholic moral theology and virtue ethics, this study advocates for precise, transparent language alongside actionable policies, expanded palliative care, robust conscience protections, comprehensive public education, and stringent safeguards to protect vulnerable populations and resist ethical erosion. Reclaiming ethical clarity requires more than abstract discussion - it demands bold action in language and policy to counter euphemistic normalization and affirm the inherent dignity of human life.
Keywords: dignity; euthanasia; human suffering; medical aid in dying; palliative care; physician-assisted suicide; public policy; sanctity of life.
© Catholic Medical Association 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Perspectives of Dignity and Assisted Dying.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Feb;65(2):e123-e136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 14. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023. PMID: 36244639
-
The development of a core outcome set for evaluating and enhancing palliative sedation in clinical research and practice: The COSEDATION study protocol.Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Jul 12;19:26323524251340706. doi: 10.1177/26323524251340706. eCollection 2025. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025. PMID: 40655532 Free PMC article.
-
Minors and euthanasia: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;176(7):837-847. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2934-8. Epub 2017 Jun 1. Eur J Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 28573404
-
Migration policies versus public health - the ethics of Covid-19 related movement restrictions for asylum seekers in reception centers in Greece in 2020.Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 11;9:115. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20547.3. eCollection 2024. Wellcome Open Res. 2024. PMID: 39296369 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
References
-
- Aquinas Thomas. 1947. Summa Theologiae. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers.
-
- Augustine. 2003. The City of God. Translated by Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin Books.
-
- Battin Margaret P. 2005. Ending Life: Ethics and the Way We Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
- Beauchamp Tom L., Childress James F.. 2019. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
- Callahan Daniel. 1993. The Troubled Dream of Life: Living with Mortality. New York: Simon & Schuster.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources