Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 15:00243639251356676.
doi: 10.1177/00243639251356676. Online ahead of print.

The Power of Words: Rebranding Euthanasia and Undermining Life's Sanctity

Affiliations

The Power of Words: Rebranding Euthanasia and Undermining Life's Sanctity

Jay J Oh. Linacre Q. .

Abstract

Language shapes ethical perceptions, profoundly influencing societal attitudes toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Historically condemned by Western medicine as a violation of life's sanctity, euthanasia has undergone a dramatic transformation through deliberate linguistic reframing. Euphemisms such as "death with dignity" and "medical aid in dying" align euthanasia with values of compassion, autonomy, and patient empowerment, often overshadowing its moral implications for human dignity. This article critically examines how these linguistic shifts have influenced the normalization of euthanasia; broadened eligibility criteria; and facilitated its legal acceptance across nations like the Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada. Engaging secular arguments from consequentialism and autonomy-based ethics reveals their limitations, particularly their disregard for moral intentionality, relational responsibilities, and the intrinsic worth of life. Drawing on Catholic moral theology and virtue ethics, this study advocates for precise, transparent language alongside actionable policies, expanded palliative care, robust conscience protections, comprehensive public education, and stringent safeguards to protect vulnerable populations and resist ethical erosion. Reclaiming ethical clarity requires more than abstract discussion - it demands bold action in language and policy to counter euphemistic normalization and affirm the inherent dignity of human life.

Keywords: dignity; euthanasia; human suffering; medical aid in dying; palliative care; physician-assisted suicide; public policy; sanctity of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aquinas Thomas. 1947. Summa Theologiae. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers.
    1. Augustine. 2003. The City of God. Translated by Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin Books.
    1. Battin Margaret P. 2005. Ending Life: Ethics and the Way We Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    1. Beauchamp Tom L., Childress James F.. 2019. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    1. Callahan Daniel. 1993. The Troubled Dream of Life: Living with Mortality. New York: Simon & Schuster.

LinkOut - more resources