Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):106352.
doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.106352.

Endoscopic techniques and factors for complications in pediatric esophageal foreign body removal

Affiliations

Endoscopic techniques and factors for complications in pediatric esophageal foreign body removal

Lucas Dourado Mapurunga Pereira et al. World J Gastrointest Endosc. .

Abstract

Background: Foreign body (FB) ingestion is one of the most challenging clinical situations faced by endoscopists. Most esophageal FB impaction emergencies occur in children. It is important to study the epidemiological profile and endoscopic methods for treating FB impacted in the esophagus of children, as it can help in the development of more effective, safe and personalized preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Aim: To define the profile of children seeking emergency care due to FB impaction in the esophagus, analyze factors associated with complications, and evaluate the effectiveness of rigid (RE) and flexible endoscopes (FE).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 166 children with impacted FB in the esophagus who underwent an endoscopy (FE = 84 vs RE = 82) at the Dr. José Frota Institute was performed. The primary outcomes were to assess the efficacy of the endoscopic technique and factors associated with complications. The secondary outcomes were age group, gender, symptoms, length of hospital stay, and location of the FB.

Results: Boys (66.9%), preschoolers (43.4%), FB > 24 hours (62.7%), cervical esophagus (60.8%), coin ingestion (57.2%) and complaints of dysphagia (24.9%) and sialorrhea (23.1%) were the predominant findings. Endoscopy was successful (90.4%) with sedation (89.1%). A total of 97% of patients were discharged from the hospital, while 3% died. The average hospital stay length was 2.6 days. Most patients did not experience complications predominated (64.5%). Esophageal perforations were more frequent after RE (11% vs 4.8%), while FE was more effective (95.2% vs 85.4%). The χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. For continuous variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test or analysis of variance was used. Statistical analyses were performed in R® software (version 1.3.1093).

Conclusion: Coins were the most frequent FBs and were mainly lodged in the upper esophagus of preschool boys. Risk factors for complications due to esophageal FB include battery ingestion, delayed removal (> 48 hours) and lodging in the thoracic esophagus. FE was generally more effective than RE for removing FBs; both procedures are safe.

Keywords: Complications; Endoscopy; Esophagus; Flexible endoscopy; Foreign bodies; Pediatrics; Rigid endoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Endoscopic view. A: Endoscopic removal of coin; B: Esophageal perforation.

Similar articles

  • Foreign Body Ingestion in Children: A 16-year Experience.
    Di Siena A, Melli P, Rodofile F, Rodaro C, Marino M, Castriotta L, Beorchia Y, Pedduzza A, Di Giorgio A, Cogo P. Di Siena A, et al. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2025 Jul;28(4):215-223. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2025.28.4.215. Epub 2025 Jul 7. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40697767 Free PMC article.
  • Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).
    Papatsoris A, Geavlete B, Radavoi GD, Alameedee M, Almusafer M, Ather MH, Budia A, Cumpanas AA, Kiremi MC, Dellis A, Elhowairis M, Galán-Llopis JA, Geavlete P, Guimerà Garcia J, Isern B, Jinga V, Lopez JM, Mainez JA, Mitsogiannis I, Mora Christian J, Moussa M, Multescu R, Oguz Acar Y, Petkova K, Piñero A, Popov E, Ramos Cebrian M, Rascu S, Siener R, Sountoulides P, Stamatelou K, Syed J, Trinchieri A. Papatsoris A, et al. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085. Epub 2025 Jun 30. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025. PMID: 40583613 Review.
  • Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.
    Garside R, Pitt M, Somerville M, Stein K, Price A, Gilbert N. Garside R, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16545207
  • The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
    DeBattista C, Schatzberg AF. DeBattista C, et al. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024. PMID: 38993656 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.
    Cedeno R, Bohlen J. Cedeno R, et al. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.

References

    1. Sugawa C, Ono H, Taleb M, Lucas CE. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: A review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;6:475–481. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wahid FI, Rehman HU, Khan IA. Management of foreign bodies of upper digestive tract. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66:203–206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrari D, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, Riva CG, Rausa E, Siboni S, Toti F, Bonavina L. Flexible versus rigid endoscopy in the management of esophageal foreign body impaction: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Ikenberry SO, Jue TL, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Fanelli RD, Fisher LR, Fukami N, Harrison ME, Jain R, Khan KM, Krinsky ML, Maple JT, Sharaf R, Strohmeyer L, Dominitz JA. Management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1085–1091. - PubMed
    1. Magalhães-Costa P, Carvalho L, Rodrigues JP, Túlio MA, Marques S, Carmo J, Bispo M, Chagas C. Endoscopic Management of Foreign Bodies in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: An Evidence-Based Review Article. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2016;23:142–152. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources