Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 22;7(8):101431.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101431. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable HCC: Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence

Affiliations

Efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable HCC: Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence

Giulia Francesca Manfredi et al. JHEP Rep. .

Abstract

Background & aims: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) is a standard-of-care treatment in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Verification of its effectiveness outside clinical trials is an area of unmet need, especially in estimating long-term survival outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane libraries to evaluate therapy outcomes in patients treated with frontline A+B for uHCC outside trials. Pooled estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 and 12 months were calculated from individual patient-level data using random-effects analysis.

Results: Of 2,179 patients selected from 12 cohorts, 80.5% were male, median age was 66 years (IQR 61.6-73.0), 61.6% had advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 83.6% were Child-Pugh (CP) class A. Pooled 6- and 12-month OS was 82% (95% CI: 76-86%; I 2 = 80%) and 65% (95% CI: 60-70%; I 2 = 66%). Median OS of patients with CP-A liver function was 20.9 months (95% CI: 15.7-20.9), consistent with IMbrave150 estimates (19.2 months, 95% CI: 17.0-23.7, p = 0.58). Pooled PFS at 6 and 12 months was 57% (95% CI: 53-61%; I 2 = 49%) and 35% (95% CI: 31-39%, I 2 = 60%). Among patients with longer follow-up, the OS (n = 1,783) and PFS (n = 959) rates were 52% (95% CI: 46-58; I 2 = 90%) and 26% (95% CI: 17-37; I 2 = 91%) at 18 months, respectively. At 24 months, OS (n = 1,556) rate was 39% (95% CI: 31-49; I 2 = 90%) and PFS (n = 732) rate was 25% (95% CI: 12-45; I 2 = 95%).

Conclusions: The effectiveness of A+B after registration mirrors its efficacy estimates from clinical trial datasets. Long-term survival at 24 months can be achieved in up to 39% of patients with uHCC treated with A+B in routine clinical practice.

Impact and implications: This study provides real-world evidence supporting the long-term efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, showing survival outcomes similar to those achieved in clinical trials. These findings are important for clinicians in supporting A+B as a frontline treatment, particularly for patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function. They also offer valuable insights for policymakers and researchers for optimising treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of potential variability in patient populations.

Keywords: Child–Pugh; HCC; Immunotherapy; RWE; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

GFM received travel support from Roche. CC received speaker fees and advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Ipsen, and travel support from Roche. AntD received educational support for congress attendance from Roche, and consultancy fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Chugai. MatP received speaker honoraria from Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he is a consultant/advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he received grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, and Roche, and travel support from Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, and Roche. BS received grant support (to institution) from AstraZeneca and Eisai, travel support from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Gilead, and Roche, as well as speaker honoraria from Eisai and AstraZeneca. YHH received honoraria from AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD, Eisai, Gilead, and BMS. AndD received honoraria from Astrazeneca, Eisai, and Roche. AV holds consulting and advisory roles with AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, BeiGene, Böhringer Mannheim, BMS, EISAI, Incyte, Ipsen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, and Tahio. PG received honoraria from Bayer, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Adaptimmune, BMS, Eisai, MSD, Sirtex, Lilly, Roche, Guerbet, and Ipsen. LR reports consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Elevar Therapeutics, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Servier, Taiho Oncology, and Zymeworks; lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Guerbet, Incyte, Ipsen, Roche, and Servier; travel expenses from AstraZeneca; and research grants (to institution) from Agios, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Servier, TransThera, and Zymeworks. HJC holds consulting or advisory roles with Eisai, Roche, Bayer, ONO, MSD, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, Servier, AstraZeneca, SillaJen, Menarini, and GreenCross Cell, and has received research grants from Roche, Dong-A ST, and Boryung Pharmaceuticals. FP received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bracco, ESAOTE, EISAI, Exact Sciences, GE, Gilead, IPSEN, MSD, Nerviano, Roche, Samsung, and Siemens Healthineers. AP has served on medical advisory boards for Genentech, AstraZeneca, and Exelexis. AGS has served as a consultant or on advisory boards for Genentech, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Bayer, Elevar, Exelixis, Merck, Boston Scientific, Sirtex, HistoSonics, FujiFilm Medical Sciences, Exact Sciences, Roche, Abbott, Glycotest, Freenome, and GRAIL. DJP received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, EISAI, IPSEN, and Bayer Healthcare, and travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche, IPSEN, DaVolterra, Mursla, and Astra Zeneca; and research funding (to institution) from MSD and BMS. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forest plots of the pooled OS rates at (A) 6, (B) 12, (C) 18, and (D) 24 months. Lines represent the 95% CI for the OS rate for each considered timeline for each study. Size of squares represents the weight of each study. Diamonds represent the pooled effect. OS, overall survival.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of the (A) OS curves and (B) PFS curves from the CP-A observational cohort vs. the IMbrave150 cohort. The median OS of the IMbrave150 cohort was 19.2 months (95% CI: 17.0–23.7), whereas that reported in the real-world cohort was 20.9 months (95% CI: 15.7–20.9) with no significant differences reported between the two cohorts (log rank p = 0.58). The median PFS in the real-word cohort was 11.8 months (95% CI: 10.5–18.1), compared with 6.9 months in the IMbrave150 cohort (95% CI: 5.7–8.6; log rank p <0.0001). CP, Child–Pugh; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plots of the pooled PFS rates at (A) 6, (B) 12, (C) 18, and (D) 24 months. Lines represent the 95% CI for the PFS rate for each considered timeline for each study. Size of squares represents the weight of each study. Diamonds represent the pooled effect. PFS, progression-free survival.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plots of the (A) pooled ORR and (B) pooled DCR according to RECIST v1.1. Lines represent the 95% CI for the (A) ORR or (B) DCR for each study. Size of squares represents the weight of each study. Diamonds represent the pooled effect. CP, Child–Pugh; DCR, disease control rate; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

References

    1. Cheng A.L., Qin S., Ikeda M., et al. Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2022;76:862–873. - PubMed
    1. Finn R.S., Qin S., Ikeda M., et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1894–1905. - PubMed
    1. Abou-Alfa G.K., Lau G., Kudo M., et al. Tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. NEJM Evid. 2022;1 - PubMed
    1. Ramaswami R., Uldrick T.S. Reflecting the real world of cancer care - the impact of broadening trial eligibility. NEJM Evid. 2024;3 - PubMed
    1. Cabibbo G., Celsa C., Rimassa L., et al. Navigating the landscape of liver cancer management: study designs in clinical trials and clinical practice. J Hepatol. 2024;80:957–966. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources