Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 3:16:1631525.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1631525. eCollection 2025.

What are the functional outcomes of total laryngeal transplantation? A systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

Affiliations

What are the functional outcomes of total laryngeal transplantation? A systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

Douglas Henderson et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aims to evaluate the functional outcomes of total laryngeal transplantation by synthesizing findings from both preclinical and clinical studies. It focuses on assessing postoperative functional recovery, including swallowing, airway patency, phonation, and speech, while also considering the associated morbidities and immunosuppressive strategies.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted for functional outcomes of total laryngeal transplantation through PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Case reports, case series, letters to the editor, reviews, and preclinical studies related to laryngeal transplantation were eligible for inclusion. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed via the CAMARADES checklist for preclinical studies and the JBI checklists for clinical studies.

Results: Out of n=188 identified studies, n=16 (8.5%) met the inclusion criteria. There were n=13 (81%) clinical and n=3 (19%) preclinical studies. In preclinical models, canine and minipig studies showed partial recovery: electrical stimulation restored vocal fold mobility in n=8 (40%) of canine allografts; some minipigs recovered swallowing, vocalization, and short-term survival post-transplant without immunosuppression, though all canines remained tracheostomy-dependent. Among n=18 (100%) human recipients, speech or phonation was restored fully or partially in n=12 (67%), as well as full or partial oral intake. Here, n=3 patients (17%) died within two years post-VCA, while n=4 (36%) resumed full oral intake. Voice quality was considered as satisfactory or better than pre-VCA in n=6 (55%) patients, whereas airway patency was deemed good or excellent. Nonetheless, no patient regained full vocal fold mobility. However, n=1 (5.6%) patient was able to breathe without a tracheostomy, and n=1 (5.6%) could intermittently cap their tracheostomy tube. Immunosuppressive regimens included tacrolimus (n=18, 100%), mycophenolate mofetil (n=15, 83%), corticosteroids (n=15, 83%), and anti-thymocyte globulin (n=6, 33%), with adjunctive use of leflunomide and stem cells in select cases.

Conclusion: Laryngeal transplantation shows promising results in restoring swallowing and phonation, but challenges remain for breathing without tracheostomy. The procedure remains an experimental surgery, still associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and requires lifelong immunosuppression. Future research, including long-term follow-up, larger-scale trials and interdisciplinary collaboration, is essential to further refine this procedure and evaluate its outcomes comprehensively.

Keywords: VCA; allotransplantation; functional outcomes; laryngeal transplantation; vascularized composite allografts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart.

References

    1. Sasaki CT, Buckwalter J. Laryngeal function. Am J Otolaryngol. (1984) 5:281–91. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0709(84)80039-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wells MW, Rampazzo A, Papay F, Gharb BB. Two decades of hand transplantation: A systematic review of outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. (2025). - PubMed
    1. Knoedler L, Schaschinger T, Niederegger T, Hundeshagen G, Panayi AC, Cetrulo CL, et al. Multi-center outcome analysis of 16 face transplantations – A retrospective OPTN study. Transpl Int. (2025) 38:14107. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.14107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knoedler L, Hoch CC, Knoedler S, Klimitz FJ, Schaschinger T, Niederegger T, et al. Objectifying aesthetic outcomes following face transplantation – the AI research metrics model (CAARISMA ® ARMM). J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. (2025) 126:102277. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102277 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cetrulo CLJ, Li K, Salinas HM, Treiser MD, Schol I, Barrisford GW, et al. Penis transplantation: first US experience. Ann Surg. (2018) 267:983. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002241 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources