Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2025 Jun 23:rs.3.rs-6265068.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6265068/v1.

Randomized Feasibility Trial of Teleyoga versus In-Person Yoga for Treating Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Veterans

Louise Mahoney  1 , Shweta Pahade  1 , Heidi Mahoney  1 , Korrine Fitz  1 , Audrey Keaney  1 , Kelly Parker-Bridges  1 , Jasmin M Francisco  1 , Annie Lau  1 , Rita Hitching  1 , Beth Walker  2 , Arushi Gupta  1 , Booil Jo  3 , Jessica A Lohnberg  2 , J David Clark  2 , Peter J Bayley  1
Affiliations

Randomized Feasibility Trial of Teleyoga versus In-Person Yoga for Treating Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Veterans

Louise Mahoney et al. Res Sq. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain impacts approximately 20% of the United States adult population and 50-75% of Veterans. It is treatment-resistant, and medications include the risk of addiction or overdose. The VA is promoting complementary and integrative health (CIH) for use along with existing treatments. Yoga can provide effective treatment for many health problems, including pain. Some of the challenges of providing yoga in healthcare include barriers such as space, time, and transportation. We studied the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) treating Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain with yoga delivered online versus in-person.

Methods: We developed a yoga protocol for treating chronic musculoskeletal pain online using online cohorts (n = 9, 15) with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Optimal treatment parameters were established. The resulting yoga protocol consisted of 12 weekly 75-minute classes with home-practice on 5 non-class days/week. The second phase of the study established the feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing in-person and online yoga. Thirty-four participants (30 male) were randomized to in-person (n = 16) or online yoga (n = 18). Measures were collected at baseline and end-of-treatment.

Results: We successfully met our Veterans participant recruitment goals for the study. Furthermore, the retention rates were 83% for teleyoga and 68% for in-person yoga, which exceeded our a priori feasibility target of 65%. Protocol adherence was 8.62 classes (71.8%, range = 2-12) in the teleyoga group and 9.25 classes (77.1%, range = 4-12) for in-person yoga, again exceeding our feasibility rate of 65%. Treatment satisfaction was measured using a 33-item questionnaire where each item was rated on a 0-4-point scale. Average treatment satisfaction was 3.2 in the teleyoga group and 3.6 in the in-person group, exceeding the feasibility target of ≥ 2. There were no serious adverse events. Yoga fidelity was assessed by scoring 20% of the classes and was 91% overall. Analysis of secondary outcome measures showed that only the teleyoga group experienced a statistically significant reduction in pain.

Conclusion: It is feasible to conduct an RCT comparing teleyoga to in-person yoga to treat chronic musculoskeletal pain in Veterans. Treatment may provide a reduction in pain severity and pain interference.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04074109, August 29, 2019.

Keywords: chronic pain; feasibility; musculoskeletal pain; teleyoga; veteran; yoga.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phase 2 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Flow Chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total Attendance by Group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Katz WA: Musculoskeletal Pain and its Socioeconomic Implications. Clinical Rheumatology 2002, 21(S1):S2–S4. - PubMed
    1. Tick H, Nielsen A, Pelletier KR, Bonakdar R, Simmons S, Glick R, Ratner E, Lemmon RL, Wayne P, Zador V: Evidence-Based Nonpharmacologic Strategies for Comprehensive Pain Care: The Consortium Pain Task Force White Paper. Explore (NY) 2018, 14(3):177–211. - PubMed
    1. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R: CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016. Jama 2016, 315(15):1624–1645. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA, Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP et al. : Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017, 166(7):514–530. - PubMed
    1. PROVISION OF COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE HEALTH [https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=75b909fd8ebeb06bJmltdHM9MTcwMTczNDQwMCZpZ...]

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources