The Introduction of the vNOTES Hysterectomy in The Netherlands: A Nationwide Cohort Study
- PMID: 40678846
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18307
The Introduction of the vNOTES Hysterectomy in The Netherlands: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the peri- and postoperative outcomes of the vNOTES hysterectomy in the Netherlands during implementation.
Study design: Nationwide cohort study.
Setting: vNOTES hysterectomies performed in the Netherlands by 15 hospitals since the implementation of the technique, from August 2019 to September 2024.
Population: 673 patients undergoing vNOTES hysterectomy.
Methods: Descriptive data are presented as frequencies with percentage or mean with range. Logistic regression was used to assess the risk of conversions/complications per BMI group.
Main outcome measures: Peri- and postoperative outcomes such as operating time, conversions, and complications.
Results: The mean operating time was 67.4 min (range 24-210). There were 37 (5.5%) conversions and 94 (15.5%) complications. Nineteen (2.8%) complications were perioperative, and 75 (12.7%) postoperative. Ten (1.5%) of the perioperative complications were classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) 1, and nine (1.3%) as CD3. Postoperatively, 18 patients (3.1%) had a reintervention (N = 17 CD3, N = 1 CD4), and two (0.3%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (CD4). The mean blood loss was 127 mL (range 50-2000), and 220 (37%) of patients were discharged the same day.
Conclusions: This large nationwide cohort study during implementation of the vNOTES hysterectomy demonstrates the safety and feasibility of this upcoming technique, reporting on a short surgery duration and a similar complication percentage compared to other methods of hysterectomy.
Keywords: complications; vNOTES hysterectomy; vaginal‐assisted NOTES hysterectomy.
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- F. Tummers, J. Hoebink, S. R. C. Driessen, F. W. Jansen, and A. R. H. Twijnstra, “Decline in Surgeon Volume After Successful Implementation of Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: An Undesired Side Effect?,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 100, no. 11 (2021): 2082–2090.
-
- J. W. Aarts, T. E. Nieboer, N. Johnson, et al., “Surgical Approach to Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disease,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, no. 8 (2015): CD003677.
-
- C. M. Pickett, D. D. Seeratan, B. W. J. Mol, et al., “Surgical Approach to Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disease,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 8, no. 8 (2023): CD003677.
-
- J. Baekelandt and S. Kapurubandara, “Benign Gynaecological Procedures by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES): Complication Data From a Series of 1000 Patients,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 256 (2021): 221–224.
-
- L. Vacca, E. Rosato, R. Lombardo, et al., “Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Urogynecological Surgery: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 19 (2024): 5707.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
