Correlations of kinematic data with robotic experience and duration of practice on complications and readmissions
- PMID: 40679677
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02557-1
Correlations of kinematic data with robotic experience and duration of practice on complications and readmissions
Abstract
Robotic surgery is increasingly prevalent in thoracic surgery. Studies of specific kinematic data on outcomes are missing. The object of this study was to examine correlations between years in practice, robotic experience, and kinematic (motion) data on complications and readmissions. Kinematic data from the first lymph node dissection of anatomic robotic lung resections were combined with data from a prospectively maintained single institution database. Kinematic data included arm movement speed, economy of motion, and camera movement. Lobectomies and segmentectomies were matched and propensity-score weighted with inverse-probability treatment weights. Pearson's correlations, between years in practice, robotic experience, and kinematic data; and logistic regression; between years in practice and robotic experience on complications and readmissions were done. Lobectomies, 42, and segmentectomies, 31, from 2022 to 2023 were included. After matching, lymph nodes sampled were greater with lobectomies than segmentectomies, but other data were well matched; nodes sampled with lobes 13.4 vs 7.6 with segments, p < 0.001. Years in practice and robotic experience were not correlated with complications or readmissions. Significant correlations were noted between kinematic data and robotic experience. Length of stay had a negative correlation with robotic experience, -0.16, p < 0.001. No odds ratios were significant. In this small series, decreased length of stay was correlated with increased robotic experience which was a stronger outcome determinant than practice years. The complications and readmissions were not correlated with either measure. Increasing robotic experience may help optimize patient care but additional data are needed to establish usefulness of specific kinematic data.
Keywords: Correlations; Kinematics; Outcomes; Thoracic surgery.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare that there are no competing interests. Disclosures: Jon Wee is a consultant for PanTher, Ethicon, and Medtronic. All other authors report no disclosures.
Similar articles
-
Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;9(5):428-437. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00005-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024. PMID: 38428441 Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Pelvic Cancers: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jul 15;56(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01251-7. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40660048
-
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. Epidemiol Prev. 2013. PMID: 23851286 Italian.
-
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25560797
-
Can Teamwork and High-Volume Experience Overcome Challenges of Lymphadenectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients (Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m2 or Greater) with Endometrial Cancer?: A Cohort Study of Robotics and Laparotomy and Review of Literature.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jun;28(5):959-966. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001255. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29621128 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bertolaccini L, Rocco G. History and development of minimally invasive surgery: VATS surgery. Shanghai Chest. 2019;3(0). https://doi.org/10.21037/shc.2019.03.01
-
- Al-Mufarrej F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, Strother E, Najam F, Gharagozloo F (2010) From Jacobeaus to the da Vinci: thoracoscopic applications of the robot. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181cdb9e5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Melfi FMA, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA (2002) Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21(5):864–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00102-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mattioni G, Palleschi A, Mendogni P, Tosi D (2022) Approaches and outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer: a narrative review. J Robot Surg 17(3):797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01512-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Paglialunga PL, Molins L, Guzmán R et al (2024) Robotic lobectomy learning curve has better clinical outcomes than videothoracoscopic lobectomy. J Clin Med 13(6):1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061653 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical