Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 16:S0828-282X(25)00547-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2025.06.077. Online ahead of print.

Automatically Derived Unipolar Low-Voltage-Area Burden for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes

Affiliations

Automatically Derived Unipolar Low-Voltage-Area Burden for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes

Xiuyu Qi et al. Can J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Unipolar voltage mapping has shown value in delineating comprehensive atrial substrates. However, the clinical application of unipolar low-voltage areas (Uni-LVAs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is limited, largely because of the absence of a well established voltage threshold. In this study we aimed to: (1) define the threshold for Uni-LVA in the left atrium (LA); and (2) investigate the association between Uni-LVA burden and ablation outcomes in a prospective AF cohort.

Methods: The Uni-LVA threshold was defined as the average of the 6 cutoff values, representing the voltage at 95% of all electrograms from a reference cohort who underwent left-sided accessory pathway ablation and concomitant LA mapping. In a single-centre, prospective AF ablation cohort, LA mapping was conducted and the Uni-LVA burden was automatically calculated.

Results: Uni-LVA was defined as an area with an amplitude of < 1.6 mV. In 145 patients, the Uni-LVA burden was automatically obtained using customized software. During a follow-up period of 16 ± 4 months, 44 patients experienced recurrence. Uni-LVA burden was significantly associated with recurrence rates. Compared with group 1 (< 1%), the recurrence rates for group 2 (1%-10%) and group 3 (> 10%) were significantly higher (hazard ratio, 5.08 [P<0.001] and hazard ratio, 24.07 [P < 0.001]). Receiver operator curve analysis showed significantly higher predictive efficiency for Uni-LVA burden (area under the curve, 0.880 vs 0.762; P < 0.001) compared with the bipolar low voltage burden.

Conclusions: Using a unipolar voltage threshold of < 1.6 mV, Uni-LVA burden was independently associated with long-term AF recurrence after ablation and outperformed bipolar assessment. This finding suggests Uni-LVA could serve as a valuable tool for prognostic evaluation.

Keywords: Unipolar voltage mapping; atrial fibrillation; atrial substrate; catheter ablation; low voltage area.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources