Rituximab in pathologically confirmed sarcoidosis affecting the central nervous system: a multi-center retrospective study
- PMID: 40681720
- DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-13209-7
Rituximab in pathologically confirmed sarcoidosis affecting the central nervous system: a multi-center retrospective study
Abstract
Background: Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that depletes B cells by targeting CD20, has been suggested as a treatment option for neurosarcoidosis, but evidence to support its use is limited.
Methods: Patients from four US medical centers with CNS sarcoidosis treated with rituximab were retrospectively studied. After 8 weeks of treatment, rituximab failure was defined as a similar inflammatory burden on MRI with persistent symptoms, worsening inflammatory burden on MRI with relevant symptoms, or inability to taper prednisone to less than 10 mg daily 6 months after initial infusion.
Results: Nineteen patients were included. At rituximab initiation, duration of neurosarcoidosis was 27.0 months (± 32.1), mRS was 2.0 (± 1.0), number of preceding attacks was 2 (± 1.8), and treatments previously tried were 1.0 (± 1 0.7). Patients received a median 4 g (± 2.8) over 19.0 months (± 16.8). Rituximab, alone (8/19, 42.1%) or in combination with other immunosuppressants (11/19, 57.9%), was used first or second line in 12/19 (63.2%). Failure occurred in 14/19 (73.7%): relapse or disease progression in 12/14 (85.7%) and failure to spare steroids in 2/14 (14.3%). Median time to first relapse was 7.0 months (± 13.5), occurring at a median 4.0 months (± 2.6) since the last dose. Among the five responsive patients, rituximab was used as third line or later in 4/5 (80.0%), and most (4/5, 80.0%) exhibited multiple cranial neuropathies.
Conclusions: While rituximab failed in most patients with neurosarcoidosis, a small subset may benefit, particularly those with multiple cranial neuropathies, even after failure of other medications.
Keywords: B-cell depletion; Disease-modifying therapy; Neurosarcoidosis; Rituximab; Sarcoidosis.
© 2025. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: S. K. Hutto reports no disclosures; D. T. Balaban reports that his institution receives support from ArgenX for an investigator-initiated clinical trial; Z. Rohm reports no disclosures; E. Lackey reports no disclosures; R. D. Samudralwar reports no disclosures; S. El Sammak reports no disclosures; A. Nakirikanti reports no disclosures; E. Oyerinde reports no disclosures; G. Bou reports no disclosures; M. Herman reports no disclosures; L. Horta reports no disclosures; M. Taha reports no disclosures; N. Rivera Torres reports no disclosures; A. Morrison reports no disclosures; S. Shah has received honoraria from Novartis and TGTherapeutics for participation in advisory boards and consulting, respectively; S. Pawate reports no disclosures; D. Vargas reports no disclosures; W. Tyor reports no disclosures. Ethical statement: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Utilizing a shared study protocol, local institutional review boards for each participating center approved this retrospective study with complete waivers of consent granted in view of its retrospective nature and all procedures being previously performed as a manner of routine care. Upon request by qualified investigators, anonymized data will be made available as subject to ethics board approval.
References
-
- Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS (2007) Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med 357:2153–2165 - PubMed
-
- Stern BJ, Royal W, Gelfand JM et al (2018) Definition and consensus diagnostic criteria for neurosarcoidosis: from the Neurosarcoidosis Consortium Consensus Group. JAMA Neurol 75:1546–1553 - PubMed
-
- Sakthivel P, Bruder D (2017) Mechanism of granuloma formation in sarcoidosis. Curr Opin Hematol 24:59–65 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical