Digital pathways beyond Western-centric participants
- PMID: 40681901
- PMCID: PMC12274141
- DOI: 10.3758/s13428-025-02751-x
Digital pathways beyond Western-centric participants
Abstract
In 2010, Henrich and colleagues published a seminal article in which they noted that (1) studies in social and behavioural sciences oversample from Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) individuals, and (2) WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared to the rest of the world population with respect to several factors. Despite the positive reception of this article, not much has changed in the years to follow. For instance, reviews of recent papers in leading psychology journals reveal that only a small proportion of the studied samples originate from non-Western countries. This sampling bias cannot be excused for lack of means. The digital age has opened several opportunities to facilitate and support social science research with subjects from non-WEIRD backgrounds. In this article, I provide an overview of such tools and comment on the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Keywords: Cross-cultural research; Cultural generalisability; Digital data collection; Online platforms; Survey methodology.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Conflicts of interest: No conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. The American Psychologist,63(7), 602–614. - PubMed
-
- Atari, M., Xue, M. J., Park, P. S., Blasi, D. E., & Henrich, J. (2023). Which Humans?10.31234/osf.io/5b26t
-
- Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2018). The Moral Machine experiment. Nature,563(7729), 59–64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources