Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):2499.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23708-x.

Sex-specific associations of social isolation and loneliness with residual life expectancy at age 45 years among middle-aged and older adults in China

Affiliations

Sex-specific associations of social isolation and loneliness with residual life expectancy at age 45 years among middle-aged and older adults in China

Meng Zhao et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Globally, one-third of older adults experience social isolation or loneliness, making them critical public health priorities. However, the impact of social isolation and loneliness on life expectancy remains underexplored. This study investigated the separate and joint associations of social isolation and loneliness with residual life expectancy at age 45 years, alongside the sex-specific variations in these associations with the aim of informing targeted strategies for mitigating social health disparities in rapidly ageing populations.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. A total of 11,315 community dwellers (5,274 men; 6,041 women) aged 45 years and above included. After the baseline 2011 assessment year, participants from the 2013, 2015, 2018, and 2020 waves were followed up. The measurements included the following: social isolation, assessed on the basis of social network usage, activities, and engagements; loneliness, evaluated on the basis of the subjective feeling of loneliness; and a flexible parametric Royston-Parmar model to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality and to predict residual life expectancy differences.

Results: In men, socially isolated and lonely individuals had the greatest reduction in residual life expectancy at age 45 years, losing 4.61 years (95% CI: 1.49-7.74) compared to those with neither experience. Social isolation alone (3.82 years lost) and loneliness alone (2.83 years lost) resulted in significant reductions. In women, social isolation alone was significantly associated with reduced residual life expectancy (3.11 years lost, 95% CI: 0.68-5.55), whereas loneliness alone and combined exposure did not show statistically significant effects.

Conclusions: Significant sex-specific differences were identified in the impact of social isolation and loneliness on residual life expectancy. Thus, implementing sex-specific public health strategies that focus on dual psychosocial intervention for men and social integration for women is crucial to mitigate premature deaths in ageing populations.

Keywords: Cohort study; Gender difference; Mortality; Social determinants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: CHARLS received ethical permits from the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Peking University (approval number: IRB00001052-11015). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Life expectancy and years of life lost based on social isolation and/or loneliness (A) Estimated life expectancy at age 45 years based on social isolation (B) Estimated life expectancy at age 45 years based on loneliness (C) Estimated life expectancy at age 45 years based on social isolation and loneliness The model was adjusted for sociodemographic (educational level, residential status, and employment status), lifestyle (smoking, alcohol intake, sleep duration, and body mass index), and health-related factors (self-rated health status, comorbidities, depression, and activities of daily living)

Similar articles

References

    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10:227–37. 10.1177/1745691614568352. - PubMed
    1. Cacioppo S, Grippo AJ, London S, Goossens L, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness: clinical import and interventions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10:238–49. 10.1177/1745691615570616. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ran Z, Wei J, Yang G, Yang C. Prevalence of social isolation in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Nurs. 2024;58:87–97. 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.05.008. - PubMed
    1. Stegen H, Duppen D, Savieri P, Stas L, Pan H, Aartsen M, et al. Loneliness prevalence of community-dwelling older adults and the impact of the mode of measurement, data collection, and country: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr. 2024;36:747–61. 10.1017/S1041610224000425. - PubMed
    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLOS Med. 2010;7:e1000316. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources