Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul 18;29(1):312.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05563-9.

Hypnosis for unplanned procedural pain in the intensive care unit: the HYPIC randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Hypnosis for unplanned procedural pain in the intensive care unit: the HYPIC randomized clinical trial

Adel Maamar et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: Pain and anxiety are frequent among critically ill patients undergoing unplanned invasive procedures, and pharmacological pain relief is not always possible. Although hypnosis is widely used in planned painful procedures, studies are lacking in this specific setting. Thus, we aimed to assess whether hypnosis plus standard care reduced pain and anxiety in critically ill patients undergoing an unplanned invasive procedure in comparison to standard care.

Methods: The HYPIC trial was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial of hypnosis during unplanned invasive procedures versus standard care for critically ill patients conducted in two French intensive care units (ICUs) from December 27, 2019, to January 25, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive hypnosis plus standard care by trained healthcare providers or standard care. The hypnotherapists were in the room for both arms to maintain blindness. The primary endpoint was the difference in pain level experienced during the invasive procedure assessed immediately after the end of the procedure between the two groups. The secondary outcomes were anxiety level, lidocaine consumption and stress experienced by the ICU nurses in charge of the patients.

Results: We included 78 patients. The pain level, assessed with a numeric pain scale (range, 0-10), was not significantly different between the two groups (2.2 ± 2.9 vs. 2.2 ± 3, difference 0 pts [95% CI -1.3; 1.3], p = 0.89). The level of anxiety was significantly lower in the hypnosis group (2.4 ± 2.8 vs. 4.1 ± 3, difference - 1.7 [-3; -0.4], p = 0.01), as was the level of stress experienced by the ICU nurses (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 0.9 ± 1.5, difference - 0.8 [-1.3;-0.3], p = 0.003), and the patients were three times less likely to require increased lidocaine consumption (odds ratio: 0.3 [0.13-0.84], p = 0.02) in the hypnosis group.

Conclusion: While hypnosis did not result in a statistically significant reduction in unplanned procedural pain, it seems to reduce anxiety, increase comfort, and reduce the stress level of healthcare providers.

Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04129333) on 14 October 2019, before the first patient was enrolled.

Keywords: Catheter placement; Chest tube; Critical illness; Hypnosis; Intensive care unit; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The trial was approved for all centers by a central Ethics Committee (IDCRB 2019-A01775-52, Comité de Protection des Personnes Bron —Région SUD-EST II, France) according to French law on October 9, 2019. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice requirements. Written informed consent was required for all patients prior to enrollment and randomization. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram flowchart of the study patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Numeric pain scale assessing pain before (baseline), immediately after (H0) and 1 h (H1) after the end of the invasive procedure in the hypnosis and placebo groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Numeric anxiety and stress scales assessing respectively anxiety in critically ill patients undergoing unplanned invasive procedures (A) and stress in caregivers (B) before, immediately after (H0) and 1 h (H1) after the end of the invasive procedure in the hypnosis and placebo groups, respectively

References

    1. Pottier V, Daubin C, Lerolle N, Gaillard C, Viquesnel G, Plaud B, et al. Overview of adverse events related to invasive procedures in the intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40:241–6. - PubMed
    1. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e825–73. - PubMed
    1. Puntillo KA, Max A, Timsit J-F, Vignoud L, Chanques G, Robleda G, et al. Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit. The Europain® study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:39–47. - PubMed
    1. de Jong A, Molinari N, de Lattre S, Gniadek C, Carr J, Conseil M, et al. Decreasing severe pain and serious adverse events while moving intensive care unit patients: a prospective interventional study (the NURSE-DO project). Crit Care. 2013;17:R74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amraoui J, Pouliquen C, Fraisse J, Dubourdieu J, Rey Dit Guzer S, Leclerc G, et al. Effects of a hypnosis session before general anesthesia on postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent minor breast Cancer surgery: the HYPNOSEIN randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e181164. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data