Compliance with antimicrobial stewardship guidelines in surgery: an observational, multidisciplinary, cohort study
- PMID: 40684205
- PMCID: PMC12275391
- DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00636-0
Compliance with antimicrobial stewardship guidelines in surgery: an observational, multidisciplinary, cohort study
Abstract
Purpose: Antimicrobial stewardship aims to improve clinical outcomes while reducing the unintended effects of antimicrobial use. The use of antibiotics in surgical wards, except for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, has been poorly documented. Our goal was to assess the rate of compliance with the guidelines of antibiotic prescriptions in surgical wards.
Method: In a single academic center, a retrospective analysis was conducted over a two-month period to assess the rate of compliance with four criteria reflecting good practice in terms of antimicrobial stewardship: (1) decision of treatment initiation in line with the guidelines, (2) adequate spectrum of antibiotics in terms of patient characteristics; (3) duration of antibiotic treatment in compliance with the guidelines, and (4) whether re-adaptation of treatment was required. Positive responses to these four criteria indicated a 100% compliance rate. A pair of experts assessed the clinical vignettes to decide the compliance of each criterion. The secondary aims were to assess whether a 100% compliance rate was associated with positive outcomes.
Results: Among the 1,339 single stays in surgical wards, 232 patients (17%) received antibiotics during the study period. The rate of compliance with all four criteria was 33%. In addition, 149 (64%) patients complied with indication and spectrum, and 91 (39%) patients complied with indication, spectrum, and duration. Compliance with the antimicrobial treatment was associated with improved outcomes.
Conclusion: Of the patients hospitalized in the surgical wards, antimicrobial stewardship guidelines were complied with in 33% patients. Full compliance with the guidelines was associated with improved outcomes.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-025-00636-0.
Keywords: Antibiotics; Compliance; Guidelines; Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethic statement: The study received approval from our ethics committee (CERAR IRB 00010254-2023-059) and was registered by our institution (APHM) under the number 2019-01 PADS23-123. The patients were informed about the study, and a non-opposition consent was obtained from each patient. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, MacDougall C, Schuetz AN, Septimus EJ, et al. Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America and the society for healthcare epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(10):e51–77. 10.1093/cid/ciw118. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dyar OJ, Huttner B, Schouten J, Pulcini C, ESGAP (ESCMID Study Group for Antimicrobial stewardshiP). What is antimicrobial stewardship? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(11):793–8. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.026. - PubMed
-
- Wathne JS, Harthug S, Kleppe LKS, Blix HS, Nilsen RM, Charani E, et al. The association between adherence to National antibiotic guidelines and mortality, readmission and length of stay in hospital inpatients: results from a Norwegian multicentre, observational cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:63. 10.1186/s13756-019-0515-5. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Asadi L, Eurich DT, Gamble JM, Minhas-Sandhu JK, Marrie TJ, Majumdar SR. Guideline adherence and macrolides reduced mortality in outpatients with pneumonia. Respir Med. 2012;106(3):451–8. 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.11.017. - PubMed
-
- Garcin F, Leone M, Antonini F, Charvet A, Albanèse J, Martin C. Non-adherence to guidelines: an avoidable cause of failure of empirical antimicrobial therapy in the presence of difficult-to-treat bacteria. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(1):75–82. 10.1007/s00134-009-1660-8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources