Advancing equity in healthcare systems: understanding implicit bias and infant mortality
- PMID: 40684212
- PMCID: PMC12275399
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-025-01228-y
Advancing equity in healthcare systems: understanding implicit bias and infant mortality
Abstract
Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) and Project Implicit, this study examined whether anti-Black implicit racial biases predict infant mortality for Black Americans. We examined state-level mean Black-White Implicit Association Test (BW-IAT) Bias Scores and controlled for explicit bias scores and White infant mortality rates for over 1.7 million American participants across ten different ethnoracial groups between 2018-2020. Hierarchical linear regressions determined state-level anti-Black implicit bias significantly predicted state-level Black infant mortality rates, above and beyond explicit bias and White infant mortality, in 2018 (b = .32, t(34) = 2.09, p < .05), 2019 (b = .30, t(34) = 2.09, p < .05), and 2020 (b = .32, t(34) = 2.18, p < .05). State-level anti-Black implicit bias also explained a significant proportion of variance in state-level infant mortality rates, in 2018 (R2 = 0.30, F(3, 35) = 4.89, p < 0.01), 2019 (R2 = .33, F(3, 36) = 5.95, p < .01), and 2020 (R2 = .39, F(3, 35) = 7.58, p < .001). Also, among healthcare professionals, there are similar levels of implicit biases compared to the general American population. Findings suggest that implicit racial bias is a risk factor for Black infant mortality. These findings also point to the ethical challenge implicit biases pose to equitable decision-making and patient-provider relationships in healthcare. By integrating these insights into interdisciplinary discussions, this study provides supporting data for systemic reforms and anti-bias training to create a healthcare system grounded in fairness and equity.
Keywords: Anti-Black racism; Black Americans; Explicit bias; Implicit bias; Infant mortality.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Participants from Project Implicit received informed consent prior to participation, and the study was approved by the University of Virginia IRB (PI: Dr. Bethany Teachman). This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Abaied JL, Perry SP. Socialization of racial ideology by White parents. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2021;27(3):431. - PubMed
-
- Ahadinezhad B, Khosravizadeh O, Maleki A, Hashtroodi A. Implicit racial bias among medical graduates and students by an IAT measure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ir J Med Sci. 2022;191(4):1941–9. 10.1007/s11845-021-02756-3. - PubMed
-
- Allen MS, Iliescu D, Greiff S. Single item measures in psychological science: A call to action. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2022;38(1):1–5. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000699.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
