Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct:55:104731.
doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104731. Epub 2025 Jul 19.

Optimizing fluorescence-based caries detection: A diagnostic performance analysis of SmarTooth and DIAGNOdent pen

Affiliations
Free article

Optimizing fluorescence-based caries detection: A diagnostic performance analysis of SmarTooth and DIAGNOdent pen

Kyusik Kim et al. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2025 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DIAGNOdent (laser fluorescence [LF] pen; Kavo, Biberach, Germany), SmarTooth (SM; Smartooth, Korea), and the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS II) scoring system in detecting occlusal dental caries in permanent teeth, with micro-computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard. Furthermore, the optimal cut-off values for the two devices were determined.

Methods: In total, 173 occlusal sites from extracted permanent teeth were assessed using the LF pen, SM, and ICDAS II. Radiographic values obtained using micro-CT were set as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and optimal cut-off points were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: At the enamel demineralization (D1) and dentin demineralization (D2) thresholds, ICDAS II exhibited the highest sensitivity (D1: 0.966, D2: 0.897), whereas the LF pen exhibited the highest specificity (D1: 1.000, D2: 0.913). SM exhibited higher accuracy than did ICDAS II and the LF pen for both the D1 and D2 thresholds. The optimal cut-offs for the LF pen were as follows: sound: 0-9, enamel caries: 10-20, and dentin caries: 21-99; those for SM were as follows: sound: 0-8, enamel caries: 9-18, and dentin caries: 19-99.

Conclusions: Both the LF pen and SM have high diagnostic performance for occlusal dental caries. However, SM achieves the best overall accuracy and thus has strong potential as an effective tool for caries detection.

Keywords: Caries Detection; Diagnodent; Laser fluorescence; Occlusal caries; SmarTooth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest Smartooth (Korea) provided the DIAGNOdent pen and SmarTooth devices used in this study.

LinkOut - more resources