Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;37(4):e70100.
doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.70100.

Could Low-Value Diagnostic Tests be Compounding Access Block? A Single-Site, Cross-Sectional Study

Heidi Walker  1 , Courtney West  1 , Luke Lawton  1   2 , Theophilus I Emeto  2 , Vinay Gangathimmaiah  1   2
Affiliations

Could Low-Value Diagnostic Tests be Compounding Access Block? A Single-Site, Cross-Sectional Study

Heidi Walker et al. Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and impact of low-value diagnostic tests at a regional, major-referral, mixed Emergency Department (ED).

Methods: A single-site, cross-sectional study was conducted at Townsville University Hospital in April 2022. Adult patients (aged 18 years and above) who underwent one of 10 specified diagnostic tests were included. The tests encompassed coagulation studies, urine cultures, blood cultures, cranial computed tomography (CT) in syncope, cranial CT in minor head injury, cervical spine CT in neck trauma, ankle X-ray in acute ankle trauma, duplex lower extremity ultrasound in suspected deep vein thrombosis, CT pulmonary angiography in suspected pulmonary embolism, and CT kidney ureter bladder in renal colic. Tests were classified as low-value based on Choosing Wisely recommendations, with their value determined by a research assistant using clinical documentation, prior to the availability of test results. Emergency clinicians were blinded to the study conduct.

Results: Of all diagnostic tests performed, 48.2% (276/572) were deemed low-value, including 50.6% of laboratory tests (246/486) and 24.4% of imaging tests (21/86). The median ED length of stay was 6.1 h (IQR 3.9-8.5). Low-value imaging tests contributed to 152 lost bed-hours per 100 tests.

Conclusion: A substantial proportion of diagnostic tests were low-value, exacerbating access block and reducing the availability of ED beds, thereby delaying timely emergency care. The implementation of evidence-based, effective strategies is imperative to mitigate patient harm associated with low-value diagnostic tests.

Keywords: access block; diagnostic tests; emergency medicine; low‐value care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Timeline for calculating ED LoS and lost bed hours.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow chart of patient inclusion.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Badgery‐Parker T., Pearson S. A., Chalmers K., et al., “Low‐value care in Australian public hospitals: Prevalence and trends over time,” BMJ Quality and Safety 28, no. 3 (2019): 205–214, 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008338. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Badgery‐Parker T., Pearson S. A., Dunn S., and Elshaug A. G., “Measuring Hospital‐Acquired Complications Associated With Low‐Value Care,” JAMA Internal Medicine 179, no. 4 (2019): 499–505, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7464. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shrank W. H., Rogstad T. L., and Parekh N., “Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings,” JAMA 322, no. 15 (2019): 1501–1509, 10.1001/jama.2019.13978. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gledstone‐Brown L. and McHugh D., “Review Article: Idle 'just‐in‐Case' Peripheral Intravenous Cannulas in the Emergency Department: Is Something Wrong?,” Emergency Medicine Australasia 30, no. 3 (2018): 309–326, 10.1111/1742-6723.12877. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brownlee S., Chalkidou K., Doust J., et al., “Evidence for Overuse of Medical Services Around the World,” Lancet 390, no. 10090 (2017): 156–168, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed