Sensory score prediction and key aroma compounds characterization in fermented chopped pepper
- PMID: 40686868
- PMCID: PMC12272893
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102743
Sensory score prediction and key aroma compounds characterization in fermented chopped pepper
Abstract
Fermented chopped pepper (FCP) exhibits complex and variable aroma profiles, making it challenging to accurately predict its sensory scores and identify key aroma compounds. In this study, electronic nose (E-nose) combined with machine learning methods were applied for the prediction of FCPs sensory scores. The random forest (RF) demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy among support vector machine (SVM), multiple linear regression (MLR), and back propagation neural network (BPNN). E-nose combined with the trained RF was used to predict the sensory scores of FCPs from eight regions. Totally, 97 volatile compounds and 19 odor-active compounds were detected by GC × GC-O-Q-TOF-MS in the top-performing sample (FCP-1). Among these, 34 compounds exhibited odor activity values (OAV) greater than 1. Aroma recombination and omission experiments confirmed that linalool, phenethyl alcohol, methional, 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine, ethyl trans-4-decenoate, β-ionone, spiroxide, ethyl 2-methylbutyrate, α-terpineol, 4-ethylphenol, β-damascenone, and nerolidol were the key aroma compounds in FCP-1.
Keywords: 3-Isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (PubChem; 4-Ethylphenol (PubChem; CID: 18635); CID: 24020); CID: 31242); CID: 32594); CID: 5362583); CID: 6054); CID: 61953); CID: 638014); CID:17100); Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate (PubChem; Ethyl trans-4-decenoate (PubChem; Fermented chopped pepper; Key aroma compounds; Linalool (PubChem CID: 6549); Machine learning methods; Methional (PubChem; Odor activity values; Phenethyl alcohol (PubChem; Prediction; Spiroxide (PubChem; α-Terpineol (PubChem; β-Ionone (PubChem.
© 2025 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





References
-
- Cong L., Yuyu Z., Ping Z., Peng W., Honglei T. Characterization of the key aroma compounds in four varieties of pomegranate juice by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-olfactometry, odor activity value, aroma recombination, and omission tests. Food Science and Human Wellness. 2023;12(1):151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2022.07.033. - DOI
-
- Dong J., Li Q., Yin H., Zhong C., Hao J., Yang P., Tian Y., Jia S.R. Predictive analysis of beer quality by correlating sensory evaluation with higher alcohol and ester production using multivariate statistics methods. Food Chemistry. 2014;161:376–382. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.04.006. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Feng X., Wang H., Wang Z., Huang P., Kan J. Discrimination and characterization of the volatile organic compounds in eight kinds of huajiao with geographical indication of China using electronic nose, HS-GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC–MS. Food Chemistry. 2022;375 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131671. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gao X., Yu M., Han X., Song H., Pan W., Chen W., Xiong W. Characterization of odor-active compounds in Liuzhou River snail rice noodles soup by sensory-directed flavor analysis. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2024;131 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106276. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous