Association Between Preoperative Cognitive Performance and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: Results From a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study, and a Mendelian Randomization Study
- PMID: 40686922
- PMCID: PMC12271639
- DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70302
Association Between Preoperative Cognitive Performance and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: Results From a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study, and a Mendelian Randomization Study
Abstract
This study evaluated the association between preoperative cognitive performance and postoperative delirium (POD) using a multicenter prospective cohort, and explored potential causality using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. We analyzed data from 2257 patients aged ≥ 75 years undergoing elective noncardiac and noncranial surgeries across 16 Chinese medical centers. Preoperative cognitive assessment using Mini-Cog revealed 28.4% of patients had cognitive impairment (score ≤ 2). POD occurred in 9.7% of patients, with higher incidence among those with cognitive impairment. Logistic regression demonstrated that cognitive impairment was significantly associated with increased POD risk (odds ratio [OR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-2.74; p < 0.001). This association persisted after adjustment for demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative factors, and was confirmed through propensity score matching and inverse probability treatment weighting analyses. A nearly linear inverse association was observed between Mini-Cog scores and POD incidence. Complementary MR analysis using 139 SNPs from European ancestry data suggested that higher cognitive performance might be associated with decreased delirium risk (inverse-variance weighted OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.93; p = 0.009). Although these results point to a potential link between preoperative cognition and POD, interpretation of causality should be approached with caution, particularly given differences in populations and genetic datasets.
Keywords: Mendelian randomization; Mini‐Cog test; cognitive impairment; postoperative delirium; prospective cohort study.
© 2025 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Jin Z., Hu J., and Ma D., “Postoperative Delirium: Perioperative Assessment, Risk Reduction, and Management,” British Journal of Anaesthesia 125, no. 4 (2020): 492–504. - PubMed
-
- Zywiel M. G., Hurley R. T., Perruccio A. V., Hancock‐Howard R. L., Coyte P. C., and Rampersaud Y. R., “Health Economic Implications of Perioperative Delirium in Older Patients After Surgery for a Fragility Hip Fracture,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 97, no. 10 (2015): 829–836. - PubMed
-
- Yan E., Veitch M., Saripella A., et al., “Association Between Postoperative Delirium and Adverse Outcomes in Older Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 90 (2023): 111221. - PubMed
-
- Huang H., Li H., Zhang X., et al., “Association of Postoperative Delirium With Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 75 (2021): 110496. - PubMed
-
- Hamilton G. M., Wheeler K., Di Michele J., Lalu M. M., McIsaac D. I., “A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Examining the Impact of Incident Postoperative Delirium on Mortality,” Anesthesiology 127, no. 1 (2017): 78–88. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources