Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 29:11:8.
doi: 10.5334/jopd.80. eCollection 2023.

Data from an International Multi-Centre Study of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties and Related Variables in University Students (the SMARVUS Dataset)

Jenny Terry  1 Robert M Ross  2 Tamás Nagy  3 Mauricio Salgado  4   5 Patricia Garrido-Vásquez  6 Jacob O Sarfo  7 Susan Cooper  8 Anke C Buttner  9 Tiago J S Lima  10 İbrahim Öztürk  11 Nazlı Akay  11 Flavia H Santos  12 Christina Artemenko  13 Lee T Copping  14 Mahmoud M Elsherif  9 Ilija Milovanović  15 Robert A Cribbie  16 Marina G Drushlyak  17 Katherine Swainston  18 Yiyun Shou  19   20 Juan David Leongómez  21 Nicola Palena  22 Fitri A Abidin  23 Maria F Reyes-Rodríguez  24 Yunfeng He  13   25 Juneman Abraham  26 Argiro Vatakis  27 Kristin Jankowsky  28 Stephanie N L Schmidt  29 Elise Grimm  30 Desirée González  31 Philipp Schmid  32   33 Roberto A Ferreira  34   35 Dmitri Rozgonjuk  36   37 Neslihan Özhan  38 Patrick A O'Connor  39 Andras N Zsido  40 Gregor Stiglic  41   42 Darren Rhodes  43 Cristina Rodríguez  34   35 Ivan Ropovik  44 Violeta Enea  45 Ratri Nurwanti  46 Alejandro J Estudillo  47   48 Nataly Beribisky  16 Karel K Himawan  49   50 Linda M Geven  51   52 Anne H van Hoogmoed  53 Amélie Bret  54 Jodie E Chapman  55 Udi Alter  16   56 Zoe M Flack  57 Donncha Hanna  39 Mojtaba Soltanlou  58   59 Gabriel Banik  60 Matúš Adamkovič  61   62 Sanne H G van der Ven  53 Jochen A Mosbacher  63 Hilal H Şen  64   65 Joel R Anderson  55   66 Michael Batashvili  67 Kristel de Groot  68   69 Matthew O Parker  70 Mai Helmy  71   72 Mariia M Ostroha  73 Katie A Gilligan-Lee  12   58 Felix O Egara  74 Martin J Barwood  75 Karuna Thomas  76 Grace McMahon  77 Siobhán M Griffin  77 Hans-Christoph Nuerk  13 Alyssa Counsell  56 Oliver Lindemann  68 Dirk Van Rooy  19   78 Theresa E Wege  79 Joanna E Lewis  80 Balazs Aczel  3 Conal Monaghan  19 Ali H Al-Hoorie  81 Julia F Huber  13 Saadet Yapan  82 Mauricio E Garrido Vásquez  6 Antonino Callea  83 Tolga Ergiyen  84 James M Clay  85 Gaetan Mertens  86 Feyza Topçu  82 Merve G Tutlu  82 Karin Täht  36   87 Kristel Mikkor  36 Letizia Caso  83 Alexander Karner  88 Maxine M C Storm  68 Gabriella Daroczy  13 Rizqy A Zein  89 Andrea Greco  22 Erin M Buchanan  90 Katharina Schmid  91 Thomas E Hunt  92 Jonas De Keersmaecker  93 Peter E Branney  94 Jordan Randell  95 Oliver J Clark  96 Crystal N Steltenpohl  97   98 Bhasker Malu  99 Burcuş Teke  100 TamilSelvan Ramis  101 Stefan Agrigoroaei  30 Nicholas A Badcock  102   103 Kareena McAloney-Kocaman  104 Olena V Semenikhina  105 Erich W Graf  38 Charlie Lea  57 Kalu T U Ogba  106 Fergus M Guppy  107   108 Amy C Warhurst  109 Shane Lindsay  110 Ahmed Al Khateeb  81 Frank Scharnowski  88   111 Leontien de Kwaadsteniet  53 Kathryn B Francis  112 Mariah Lecompte  56 Lisa A D Webster  113 Kinga Morsanyi  79 Suzanna E Forwood  114 Elizabeth R Walters  94 Linda K Tip  57 Jordan R Wagge  115 Ho Yan Lai  76 Deborah S Crossland  95 Kohinoor M Darda  116 Tessa R Flack  117 Zoe Leviston  19   118 Matthew Brolly  107 Samuel P Hills  119 Elizabeth Collins  120 Andrew J Roberts  2 Wing-Yee Cheung  95 Sophie Leonard  12 Bruno Verschuere  52 Samantha K Stanley  19 Iro Xenidou-Dervou  79 Omid Ghasemi  103   121 Timothy Liew  76 Daniel Ansari  122 Johnrev Guilaran  123 Samuel G Penny  107   124 Julia Bahnmueller  79 Christopher J Hand  125 Unita W Rahajeng  46 Dar Peterburg  67 Zsofia K Takacs  126 Michael J Platow  19 Andy P Field  1
Affiliations

Data from an International Multi-Centre Study of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties and Related Variables in University Students (the SMARVUS Dataset)

Jenny Terry et al. J Open Psychol Data. .

Abstract

This large, international dataset contains survey responses from N = 12,570 students from 100 universities in 35 countries, collected in 21 languages. We measured anxieties (statistics, mathematics, test, trait, social interaction, performance, creativity, intolerance of uncertainty, and fear of negative evaluation), self-efficacy, persistence, and the cognitive reflection test, and collected demographics, previous mathematics grades, self-reported and official statistics grades, and statistics module details. Data reuse potential is broad, including testing links between anxieties and statistics/mathematics education factors, and examining instruments' psychometric properties across different languages and contexts. Data and metadata are stored on the Open Science Framework website [https://osf.io/mhg94/].

Keywords: Statistics; anxiety; education; jangle fallacy; mathematics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

A world map and tree-map providing a visual summary of the sample sizes described in Table 1.
Figure 1
The top panel is a map showing the countries from which data were collected and their respective sample sizes. The bottom panel is a treemap of sample sizes for each country, organised by continents (see Table 1 for ISO country codes).

References

    1. Baker, S. L., Heinrichs, N., Kim, H.-J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2002). The Liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: A preliminary psychometric analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(6), 701–715. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00060-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baloğlu, M. (2002). Psychometric Properties of the Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 90(1), 315–325. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.1.315 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baloğlu, M., & Zelhart, P. F. (2007). Psychometric Properties of the Revised Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. The Psychological Record, 57(4), 593–611. DOI: 10.1007/BF03395597 - DOI
    1. Behr, D. (2017). Assessing the use of back translation: The shortcomings of back translation as a quality testing method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 573–584. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2016.1252188 - DOI
    1. Behr, D., & Shishido, K. (2016). The Translation of Measurement Instruments for Cross-Cultural Surveys. In Wolf C., Joye D., Smith T., & Fu Y. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology (pp. 269–287). SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781473957893.n19 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources