Differential Distributions: A refined methodology to indirect reference interval estimation by including Patient's health status according to associated ICD-10 codes
- PMID: 40688346
- PMCID: PMC12275890
- DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00492
Differential Distributions: A refined methodology to indirect reference interval estimation by including Patient's health status according to associated ICD-10 codes
Abstract
Background: Traditional methods for estimating reference intervals (RIs) using patient's blood test results from the clinical routine, typically remove outliers without considering the nuanced health statuses of patients. This removes a vast majority of test results for reference interval estimation without considering the actual health status of the patient.
Methods: We introduce the Differential Distribution Method (DDM) which uses laboratory routine data coded with ICD-10 to approximate an underlying non-diseased age and sex stratified population from mixed clinical data. By removing test results that stem from subpopulations significantly different from the general population, reference intervals can be generated stratified by sex and age, taking into account the associated health conditions of the patients as derived by the ICD-10 coding system.
Results: Applying the DDM to blood plasma potassium levels demonstrated its ability to adjust RIs dynamically across different patient groups. The method effectively differentiated RIs in a decade-based stratification, showing significant variability and tighter confidence intervals, particularly in older (above 60 years old) adults. The RIs were slightly wider with advancing age in both males and females, while their standard deviation was reduced by removing large portions of test results differing significantly, grouped by either their individual ICD-10 code or clusters of ICD-10 codes.
Conclusions: This DDM data mining approach offers a robust framework for RI inference by generating adjusted RIs that incorporate clinical nuances reflected in ICD-10 codes. This approach not only enhances the accuracy of patient diagnostics but also facilitates the identification of potential multimorbidities affecting laboratory results.
Keywords: Clinical diagnostics; Laboratory Medicine; Machine Learning; Personalized Medicine; Reference intervals.
© 2025 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Reports a relationship with that includes:. Has patent pending to. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39051924
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;2015(9):CD009263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009263.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26417712 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.pub2. PMID: 11687058 Updated.
-
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.2025 Jun 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jun 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 31613449 Free Books & Documents.
References
-
- Gowda S., Desai P.B., Kulkarni S.S., Hull V.V., Math A.A.K., Vernekar S.N. Markers of renal function tests. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2010;2:170–173. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624135 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Wayne . Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008. Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory: Approved Guideline. CLSI Document EP28-A3c.
-
- Martinez-Sanchez L., Cobbaert C.M., Noordam R., Brouwer N., Blanco-Grau A., Villena-Ortiz Y., Thelen M., Ferrer-Costa R., Casis E., Rodríguez-Frias F., den Elzen W.P.J. Indirect determination of biochemistry reference intervals using outpatient data. PLoS One. 2022;17 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268522. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources