Treatment Preferences for Novel Type 2 Diabetes Oral Medications: Insights from the Asian Diabetes Patient Preference Study
- PMID: 40690109
- DOI: 10.1007/s13300-025-01770-3
Treatment Preferences for Novel Type 2 Diabetes Oral Medications: Insights from the Asian Diabetes Patient Preference Study
Abstract
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global health concern with significant mortality rate associated with comorbidities like diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Thus, treatment guidelines recommend first-line treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is) and/or glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists for T2DM with comorbidities. However, in patients when these treatments are not tolerated, contraindicated, or considered expensive, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4Is) serve as an add-on or alternative for glycemic control without hypoglycemia risk. This study aimed to understand patients' preferences in three South Asian countries between SGLT2I (medication A) and DPP4I (medication B) and the reasons influencing their preference for effective management of T2DM.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study (November 2021 to November 2022) across India, Taiwan, and the Philippines, patients with T2DM on both SGLT2I and DPP4I or neither completed the survey to identify their medication preferences. Differences in baseline characteristics and preferred medication (chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests) and potential attributes influencing preferences (logistic regression) were analyzed.
Results: Among 1224 participants, SGLT2I (64.5%) was significantly preferred over DPP4I (35.5%). Mean age of participants was 59.3 years and the majority were female patients/individuals (52.5%), overweight/obese (56.6%), with glycated hemoglobin levels ≥ 7% (57.6%). Common comorbidities included hypertension (62.7%) and dyslipidemia (75.5%); the majority were without history of CVD (83.7%) or CKD (84%). The most prescribed T2DM medication was biguanide (83.9%), followed by combination of SGLT2Is and DPP4Is (51.3%). The most influential attributes were blood sugar reduction (56.9%), reduced heart failure hospitalization (14.4%), and kidney disease risk reduction (12.1%). SGLT2I users showed a higher preference for heart failure hospitalization reduction (16.5%) or weight reduction (11.1%). Country of residence, thiazolidinedione use, and SGLT2I/DPP4I use were significant factors in logistic regression analyses.
Conclusion: Asian patients with T2DM preferred medication profile resembling SGLT2Is over DPP4Is. Understanding patient preferences may aid optimal glycemic control while reducing cardiovascular and renal risks.
Keywords: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors; Patient preference; Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Dr Mangesh Tiwaskar: Nothing to disclose. Dr Chii-Min Hwu: Received manuscript development funding for the current study from AstraZeneca, grant support from Sanofi, Eli Lilly, MSD, consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, honoraria and speaker bureau fees from Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Zuellig, Amgen. Dr Marcelo Lim: Received support for medical writing from AstraZeneca. Dr Apeksha Bhandary and Dr Iris Chang are employees of AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited and AstraZeneca Pharma Taiwan Limited and may own stock and stock options. Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Ethics Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from participants. We obtained approval ethics review board for all the three countries, St. Luke’s Medical Centre Institutional Ethics Review Committee for Philippines (IEC no. D1690R00082—PH 5503 IRB), Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board Certificate of Clinical Trial/Research Consent for Taiwan (IEC no. D1690R00082_7406_CCH), and Conscience Independent Ethics Committee review board for India (IEC no. D1690R00082).
Similar articles
-
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(10):CD013650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013650.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34693515 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of New-Onset Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Exposed to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, or Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists: A Population-Based Cohort Study.J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e034175. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034175. Epub 2025 May 22. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025. PMID: 40401622 Free PMC article.
-
Heterogeneous effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on nephrolithiasis in older adults with type 2 diabetes.Pharmacotherapy. 2025 Jul;45(7):426-434. doi: 10.1002/phar.70030. Epub 2025 Jun 17. Pharmacotherapy. 2025. PMID: 40525798
-
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and inverse risk of new-onset atopic dermatitis in a cohort with diabetes: a nationwide active-comparator study.Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):74-84. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf086. Br J Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 40037684
-
Dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analogues for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 10;5(5):CD012204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012204.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28489279 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global burden of disease study 2019. Results. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. 2020. Accessed on 24 June 2024. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/ .
-
- International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas, 9th edn. Brussels. Belgium; 2021. Accessed on 24 June 2024. https://www.diabetesatlas.org .
-
- GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023;402(10397):203–34.
-
- Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157: 107843. - PubMed
-
- Gnudi L. Renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: magnitude of the problem, risk factors and preventive strategies. Presse Med. 2023;52(1):104159. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources