Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 21;20(7):e0328103.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328103. eCollection 2025.

Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa: Umbrella review

Affiliations

Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa: Umbrella review

Berihun Agegn Mengistie et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent type of cancer in women globally. Early detection and treatment of precancerous cervical lesions and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are strongly advised to decrease the incidence of cervical cancer and death. Cervical cancer is a major public health concern in low- and middle-income nations, where screening and treatment options are constrained. Thus, the main objective of this umbrella review was to determine the pooled uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa.

Methods: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol for this umbrella review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with reference number CRD42024518297. We conduct a systematic and comprehensive search by using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, and Science Direct, from January 1, 2014, to September 20, 2024. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The methodological quality of the included studies was examined using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). The statistical analysis was carried out using STATA version 17, which includes descriptive analysis, forest plots for prevalence, funnel plot, and an Egger test to examine publication bias. A random-effects model was used to determine the pooled effect estimate. Publication bias was checked by using the funnel plot and Egger's tests.

Results: This umbrella review included 11 systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies across Africa with a total of 143,327 study participants. The overall prevalence of cervical cancer screening practice in Africa was 20.94% (95% CI: 15.84%-26.04%). Women's level of knowledge (AOR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.64-6.33), positive attitude toward CCS (AOR: 2.48, 95% CI: 2.18-2.81), perceived vulnerability to cervical cancer (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI: 2.75, 4.63), and history of STIs (AOR = 4.89, 95% CI: 3.14, 7.62) were significantly associated with cervical cancer screening practice. In conclusion, the combined estimate of cervical cancer screening use in Africa remains much lower (20.94%) than the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations target (70%). It indicates that there is a large gap that requires being addressed in collaboration to reduce the burden of cervical cancer and its morbidity and mortality across the continent. Therefore, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and other stakeholders shall implement effective strategies such as empowering women, improving the knowledge and attitude towards cervical cancer screening, advocacy, and expanding screening programs to all eligible women to increase utilization of cervical cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram showing the selection of studies for the umbrella review of cervical cancer screening uptake in Africa.
Fig 2
Fig 2. A forest plot for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that showing the pooled prevalence of cervical cancer screening uptake in Africa.
Fig 3
Fig 3. A Forest plot showing the sub-group analysis of uptake of cervical cancer screening by region of Africa.
Fig 4
Fig 4. A Forest plot showing the sub-group analysis of cervical cancer screening uptake in the context of Africa by study population.
Fig 5
Fig 5. A funnel plot test that demonstrating the prevalence of cervical cancer screening uptake in Africa.
Fig 6
Fig 6. A one-leave-out analysis for uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa.
Fig 7
Fig 7. A Forest plot that shows the pooled adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening uptake in Africa.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chidebe RC, Osayi A, Torode JS. The Global Fund, Cervical Cancer, and HPV Infections: What Can Low-and Middle-Income Countries Do to Accelerate Progress by 2030?. EClinicalMedicine. 2025;81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191–203. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Martel C, Plummer M, Vignat J, Franceschi S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(4):664–70. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30716 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dryden-Peterson S, Bvochora-Nsingo M, Suneja G, Efstathiou JA, Grover S, Chiyapo S, et al. HIV Infection and Survival Among Women With Cervical Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(31):3749–57. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.9613 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms