Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 21.
doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00870-x. Online ahead of print.

Multiplexed assays of variant effect for clinical variant interpretation

Affiliations
Review

Multiplexed assays of variant effect for clinical variant interpretation

Abbye E McEwen et al. Nat Rev Genet. .

Abstract

The rapid expansion of clinical genetic testing has markedly improved the detection of genetic variants. However, most variants lack the evidence needed to classify them as pathogenic or benign, resulting in the accumulation of variants of uncertain significance that cannot be used to diagnose or guide treatment of disease. Moreover, targeted therapy for cancer treatment increasingly depends on correctly identifying oncogenic driver mutations, but the oncogenicity of many variants identified in tumours remains unclear. To address these challenges, efforts to classify variants are increasingly using multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVEs), which are massively scaled experiments that can generate functional data for thousands of variants simultaneously. The rise of MAVEs is accompanied by better guidance on the use of MAVE data for classifying germline variants to aid their clinical implementation. Here, we overview MAVE technologies from their inception to their increased use in the clinic, including their roles in uncovering mechanisms for variant pathogenicity and guiding targeted therapy and drug development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Chen, E. et al. Rates and classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary disease genetic testing. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e2339571 (2023). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Rehm, H. L. et al. The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: time for a change. Genet. Med. 25, 100947 (2023). - PubMed - PMC
    1. LaDuca, H. et al. A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients. Genet. Med. 22, 407–415 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Ndugga-Kabuye, M. K. & Issaka, R. B. Inequities in multi-gene hereditary cancer testing: lower diagnostic yield and higher VUS rate in individuals who identify as Hispanic, African or Asian and Pacific Islander as compared to European. Fam. Cancer 18, 465–469 (2019). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Roberts, M. E. et al. Ancestry-specific hereditary cancer panel yields: moving toward more personalized risk assessment. J. Genet. Couns. 29, 598–606 (2020). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources