Ocular measures of controlled processing: Examining the use of proactive cognitive control in the AX-CPT
- PMID: 40691675
- DOI: 10.3758/s13421-025-01744-7
Ocular measures of controlled processing: Examining the use of proactive cognitive control in the AX-CPT
Abstract
Assessing the use of proactive cognitive control is essential for understanding how thoughts and actions are regulated. The present study aimed to determine whether proactive control can be measured through patterns of eye movements during the cue-probe delay in a spatially modified AX-CPT. Across two experiments, we found that gaze activity at screen locations where cues and probes appeared predicted both the extent of proactive control adopted by participants and their ability to override a prepotent response tendency. However, the specific cognitive processes underlying the engagement of proactive control varied depending on task demands. Specifically, when the cue-probe delay was relatively short (Experiment 1), proactive control was characterized by rapid shifts in visual attention to support cognitive demands associated with frequent changes in the location of probe stimuli. In contrast, when the cue-probe delay was extended (Experiment 2), proactive control aligned with traditional conceptualizations, relying more on increased cue maintenance. Together, these results demonstrate that eye-movement patterns may serve as the foundation for ocular-based measures of proactive control, enabling further investigation into factors influencing its engagement and potential individual differences in its use. Implications that the results have for theories of controlled processing and inhibitory control are discussed.
Keywords: Cognitive control; Cue maintenance; Eye movements; Inhibitory control; Proactive control.
© 2025. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: All procedures and materials were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at California State University, San Bernardino. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Short-Term Memory Impairment.2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 31424720 Free Books & Documents.
-
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085. Epub 2025 Jun 30. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025. PMID: 40583613 Review.
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 23235646 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ahern, S., & Beatty, J. (1979). Pupillary responses during information processing vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. Science, 205(4412), 1289–1292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.472746 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anderson, V. (2001). Assessing executive functions in children: Biological, psychological, and developmental considerations. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 4, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490110091347 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., MacDonald, A. W., III., Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: Diagnostic specificity, 4-week course, and relationships to clinical symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(1), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.1.132 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Beatty, J., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000). The pupillary system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 142–162). Cambridge University Press.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources