Mortality Outcomes in People with Lung Cancer with and without Type2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study in England
- PMID: 40692755
- PMCID: PMC12278945
- DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S498368
Mortality Outcomes in People with Lung Cancer with and without Type2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study in England
Abstract
Introduction: The impact of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on mortality following lung cancer diagnosis remains unclear, with conflicting evidence across studies. We aimed to assess differences in all-cause and cause-specific mortality between people with lung cancer with and without T2DM within a primary care population in England.
Methods: The study population was 69,674 people with incident lung cancer within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum primary care database (2010-2022). The study exposure was T2DM at cancer diagnosis, and the outcomes were all-cause and cause-specific mortality (cancer, cardio-vascular, respiratory). Cox models were fitted for each outcome adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, body mass index, calendar year and socioeconomic status (Index of Multiple Deprivation).
Results: After adjusting for age and gender, there was no evidence for a difference in all-cause mortality in people with T2DM compared with people without T2DM (IRR 0.98 95% CI 0.96, 1.01). After fully-adjusting for measured confounders, there was a small positive effect (IRR 1.07 95% CI 1.04, 1.09). After adjusting for age and gender, people with T2DM had lower rates of cancer-specific mortality compared to people without T2DM (IRR 0.96 95% CI 0.94, 0.98). However, after adjustment for all measured confounders there was a small positive association (IRR 1.05 95% CI 1.02, 1.07). In both age and gender adjusted and fully adjusted models people with T2DM had higher cardiovascular (fully adjusted HR 1.30 95% CI 1.15, 1.47) and respiratory disease mortality (fully adjusted HR 1.30 95% CI 1.15, 1.47).
Conclusion: There was robust evidence that people with T2DM had higher cardiovascular and respiratory disease mortality following lung cancer diagnosis. The relationships between T2DM and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality were highly sensitive to adjustment for confounding. Differences in studies on approaches to confounding and levels of missing data may contribute to the mixed findings on this association in the literature.
Keywords: cardiovascular mortality; lung cancer; mortality; respiratory mortality; type 2 diabetes.
Plain language summary
Lung cancer and type 2 diabetes are both common conditions that have a big impact on health outcomes worldwide. There is some evidence that people with type 2 diabetes have a higher chance of dying if they develop certain cancers than people without type 2 diabetes. It is not clear if having type 2 diabetes affects people’s chances of dying if they develop lung cancer, or if any increased risk of death is due to lung cancer or other conditions such as heart disease. We used data from general practice records linked with hospital and death records from England to investigate whether people with diabetes were more or less likely to die following being diagnosed with lung cancer overall and from three specific causes of death: cancer, heart disease and lung disease. People with type 2 diabetes were more likely to die from heart disease and lung-related illnesses after being diagnosed with lung cancer than people without type 2 diabetes. However, differences in dying overall and of dying from cancer were small and depended on how other factors, like age and smoking, were considered. These findings highlight the importance of managing heart and lung health in people living with type 2 diabetes who are diagnosed with lung cancer.
© 2025 Igbinosa et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Jennifer Quint reports grants from HDR UK, during the conduct of the study; Sanjay Popat reports personal fees from Anheart Therapeutics, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Arcus Biosciences, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, EQRx, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, GSK, Guardant Health, IO Biotech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Mirati, MSD, Novocure, Novartis, Pharmamar, Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Turning Point Therapeutics, Regeneron, outside the submitted work; Krishnan Bhaskaran reports grants from Wellcome, during the conduct of the study; Daniel Morganstein reports personal fees from BMS and Pfizer, outside the submitted work; Sarah Cook reports grants from NIHR, outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35199850 Free PMC article.
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources