Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 5;9(8):ziaf098.
doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf098. eCollection 2025 Aug.

The effect of abaloparatide on the proximal femur in men with osteoporosis assessed by three-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Affiliations

The effect of abaloparatide on the proximal femur in men with osteoporosis assessed by three-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Ruban Dhaliwal et al. JBMR Plus. .

Abstract

Abaloparatide treatment significantly increased BMD at the LS, TH, and FN compared with placebo in men with osteoporosis in the phase 3 ATOM trial. The current study used 3D-DXA modeling to evaluate the effects of abaloparatide on cortical and trabecular compartments of the proximal femur in ATOM study participants. Proximal femur DXA images were retrospectively analyzed using 3D-DXA (3D-Shaper software v2.12.0, 3D-Shaper Medical, Barcelona, Spain) to evaluate changes in bone parameters from baseline at months 6 and 12 in all randomized men from the ATOM trial. Between-group comparisons were made for percent change from baseline data based on a mixed-effect repeated-measure model with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and type of DXA scanner as fixed effects. Other covariates include BMI, age, and baseline values of bone parameters. Abaloparatide treatment significantly increased integral volumetric BMD (vBMD) (3.7%), trabecular vBMD (7.0%), cortical thickness (1.1%), and cortical surface BMD (1.7%) at 12 mo compared to baseline (p < .0001). Changes were greater for abaloparatide compared to placebo for all 4 parameters (p < .01). Significant increases from baseline compared to placebo in integral vBMD (2.7% vs -0.1%, p < .0001) and trabecular vBMD (6.1% vs -0.6%, p < .0001) were also observed at 6 mo. In conclusion, in men with osteoporosis, abaloparatide improved proximal femur 3D-DXA parameters broadly consistent with results in postmenopausal women in the ACTIVE study, adding to the growing data on abaloparatide bone structure effects at the hip.

Keywords: 3D modeling; DXA; abaloparatide; cortical volumetric BMD; osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.D. reports research support (to institution) from Alexion, Radius Health, Inc. (Radius), Shire, and Takeda, and consultant or scientific advisory board roles for Alexion, Amgen, Ascendis, Ultragenyx, Radius, and Kyowa Kirin. J.B. and Y.W. are employees of Radius. B.H.M. is a former employee of Radius. L.H. is an employee and shareholder of 3D-Shaper Medical, which received funding for this study from Radius. N.B. reports research support (to institution) from Radius.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean percent change in DXA and 3D-DXA parameters at the proximal femur from baseline to 12 mo. Abbreviations: 3D-DXA, three-dimensional DXA; ABL, abaloparatide; aBMD, areal BMD; Ct.sBMD, cortical sBMD; Ct.Th, cortical thickness; Ct.vBMD, cortical vBMD; Int.vBMD, integral vBMD; PBO, placebo; sBMD, surface BMD; Tb.vBMD, trabecular vBMD; vBMD, volumetric BMD. Longitudinal changes in hip DXA (aBMD) and 3D-DXA endpoints at 0, 6, and 12 mo after randomization. Data shown as mean ± 95% CI for percent change from baseline. **p < .01 vs PBO. ***p < .0001 vs PBO. ††p < .0001 vs baseline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
3D visualizations of the percent change from baseline in cortical vBMD, thickness, and sBMD. Abbreviations: ABL, abaloparatide; Ct.sBMD, cortical sBMD; Ct.Th, cortical thickness; Ct.vBMD, cortical vBMD; NS, not significant; PBO, placebo; sBMD, surface BMD; vBMD, volumetric BMD. Average spatial changes in 3D-DXA cortical endpoints at months 6 and 12. For each endpoint and treatment, anterior (left) and posterior (right) views of a standardized proximal femur model are shown. Blue-green colors represent increases and yellow-red colors represent decreases. NS: not significant against baseline.
Figure 3
Figure 3
2D cross-sectional changes in cortical and trabecular vBMD at month 12. Abbreviations: ABL, abaloparatide; PBO, placebo; vBMD, volumetric BMD. Cross sections displaying changes in cortical and trabecular vBMD at 12 mo in the ABL and PBO groups. Increases are presented in blue-green colors and decreases are presented in yellow-red colors.

Similar articles

References

    1. LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, et al. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(10):2049-2102. 10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singer A, Exuzides A, Spangler L, et al. Burden of illness for osteoporotic fractures compared with other serious diseases among postmenopausal women in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(1):53-62. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Genant HK, Libanati C, Engelke K, et al. Improvements in hip trabecular, subcortical, and cortical density and mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with denosumab. Bone. 2013;56(2):482-488. 10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sornay-Rendu E, Cabrera-Bravo JL, Boutroy S, Munoz F, Delmas PD. Severity of vertebral fractures is associated with alterations of cortical architecture in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(4):737-743. 10.1359/jbmr.081223 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer H, Maleitzke T, Eder C, Ahmad S, Stöckle U, Braun KF. Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(1):86. 10.1186/s40001-021-00556-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources