Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Jul 7:16:1626438.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1626438. eCollection 2025.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy combined with surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer harboring defective mismatch repair system: a large-scale multicenter propensity score analysis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy combined with surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer harboring defective mismatch repair system: a large-scale multicenter propensity score analysis

Huan-Huan Wang et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: For locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with a deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H), particularly in patients not eligible for immunotherapy, the optimal treatment remains undetermined. This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgery, surgery and chemotherapy, surgery and chemoradiotherapy, in patients with LARC harboring dMMR/MSI-H.

Methods: Patients included from three university centers between August 1, 2012 and March 1, 2023, were categorized into three treatment groups: surgery vs. surgery + chemotherapy vs. surgery + chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and toxicity. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to analyze OS and PFS; competing risk methods were employed to evaluate rates of LR and DM. Adjustments were performed utilizing inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and overlap weighting (OW) based on propensity score, employing logistic regression model. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied for both univariate and multivariate analyses to assess prognostic factors influencing patient OS and PFS.

Results: A total of 119 patients were included, with 45 patients (37.8%) receiving surgery alone, 32 (26.9%) receiving surgery + chemotherapy, and 42 (35.3%) undergoing surgery + chemoradiotherapy. In both the unadjusted cohort and after IPTW and OW adjustments, the surgery alone group (vs. surgery + chemoradiotherapy) had improved OS, PFS, LR, but no significant differences in DM. However, no statistical difference was found between the surgery vs. surgery + chemotherapy groups in OS, PFS, and DM, except for significant differences in LR. Similar results were found in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment cohorts. No adverse events of grade 5 occurred.

Conclusion: This study suggests surgery alone (without chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) may be an optimal treatment for LARC patients with dMMR/MSI-H, particularly in those who cannot tolerate or access immunotherapy. The results of this study may be used to power a randomized trial for the approaches.

Keywords: chemoradiotherapy; chemotherapy; deficient mismatch repair; locally advanced rectal cancer; overall survival; progression-free survival; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A detailed overview of the specific inclusion process for this study. pMMR, proficient DNA mismatch repair; dMMR, deficient mismatch repair; S+CT, surgery plus chemotherapy; S+CRT, surgery plus chemoradiotherapy; S+NCRT, surgery plus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; S+ACRT, surgery plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; S, surgery; S+NCT, surgery plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy; S+ACT, surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy; PSM, propensity score matching; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; OW, overlap weighting; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; LR, local recurrence; DM, distant metastasis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The OS, PFS, LR, and DM in both the unadjusted and IPTW-adjusted cohorts. (A): OS; (B) PFS; (C) LR; (D) DM. S, surgery; S+CT, surgery plus chemotherapy; S+CRT, surgery plus chemoradiotherapy; HR, hazard ratio; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; sHR, subdistribution hazard ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The UVA and MVA analysis for clinical factors affecting OS in both the unadjusted and IPTW-adjusted cohorts. (A) OS before adjustment; (B) OS after IPTW. OS, overall survival; Uni, univariate analysis; Multi, multivariate analysis; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; HR, hazard ratio; cm, centimeter.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The UVA and MVA analysis for clinical factors affecting PFS in both the unadjusted and IPTW-adjusted cohorts. (A) PFS before adjustment; (B) PFS after IPTW. PFS, progression-free survival; Uni, univariate analysis; Multi, multivariate analysis; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; HR, hazard ratio; cm, centimeter.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Azad N, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK, et al. Rectal cancer, version 2. 2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. (2022) 20:1139–67. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0051, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. (2023) 73:233–54. doi: 10.3322/caac.21772, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Papke DJ, Yurgelun MB, Noffsinger AE, Turner KO, Genta RM, Redston M. Prevalence of mismatch-repair deficiency in rectal adenocarcinomas. N Engl J Med. (2022) 387:1714–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2210175, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rödel C, Cervantes A, et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Ann Oncol. (2017) 28:iv22–40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources