Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 13;7(3):101113.
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101113. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Indications for Biceps Tenodesis in Injured Overhead Throwing Athletes Lack Consensus: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Survey

Aaron D Sciascia  1 , W Jeffrey Grantham  2 , Austin V Stone  3 , Anthony N Baumann  4 , John D Kelly 4th  5 , W Ben Kibler  2
Affiliations
Review

Indications for Biceps Tenodesis in Injured Overhead Throwing Athletes Lack Consensus: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Survey

Aaron D Sciascia et al. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the current clinical practice methods and the reported indications for biceps tenodesis in injured overhead throwing athletes.

Methods: This study combined a survey of experienced shoulder surgeons regarding their methods of establishing indications for tenodesis surgery with a systematic review of studies that reported performing biceps tenodesis in overhead throwing athletes. Both the survey and review were designed to identify methods of making the diagnosis to delineate the preoperative and intraoperative factors used to establish biceps involvement as a major component of the clinical presentation, as well as to attempt to establish a consensus for clinical practice.

Results: Eleven studies reporting on 249 overhead throwing athletes were analyzed. Elements of the history evaluation were described in 5 studies; physical examination, in 2 studies; advanced imaging, in 7 studies; and diagnostic arthroscopy, in 8 studies. One hundred nineteen responses to the survey showed a similar thought process regarding the reasoning to include biceps tenodesis, but several aspects of the process appeared to not be supported by contemporary literature. Also, there was inconsistent use of diagnostic components, with only 3 of 9 history components and 4 of 9 physical examination components being selected by more than 50% of the respondents.

Conclusions: The survey revealed there was an incompletely supported reasoning process regarding indications for tenodesis and there was no consensus regarding individual components of the history or physical examination. The literature review revealed a lack of consensus regarding which elements of the diagnostic process are integral in establishing biceps involvement in injured throwing shoulders.

Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies and cross-sectional survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors (A.D.S., W.J.G., A.V.S., A.N.B., J.D.K., W.B.K.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Systematic review search flowchart. (CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Sources of information. (Intra-Op, intraoperative; Pre-Op, preoperative.)
Fig 3
Fig 3
History item responses. (PT, physical therapy.)
Fig 4
Fig 4
Physical examination item responses. (FAIR, flexion–adduction–internal rotation.)
Fig 5
Fig 5
Surgical indications for biceps tenodesis. (SSC, subscapularis; w, with.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Boileau P., Parratte S., Chuinard C., Roussanne Y., Shia D., Bicknell R. Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: Biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:929–936. - PubMed
    1. Gottschalk M.B., Karas S.G., Ghattas T.N., Burdette R. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis for the treatment of type II and IV superior labral anterior and posterior lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2128–2135. - PubMed
    1. Gupta A.K., Chalmers P.N., Klosterman E.L., et al. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis for bicipital tendonitis with SLAP tear. Orthopedics. 2015;38:e48–e53. - PubMed
    1. Pogorzelski J., Horan M.P., Hussain Z.B., Vap A., Fritz E.M., Millett P.J. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis for treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions in a young and active population. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:371–376. - PubMed
    1. Griffin J.W., Cvetanovich G.L., Kim J., et al. Biceps tenodesis is a viable option for management of proximal biceps injuries in patients less than 25 years of age. Arthroscopy. 2019;35:1036–1041. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources