Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 9;21(4):1-6.
doi: 10.5152/iao.2025.241705.

Health-Related Quality of Life Evaluation in Children with Cochlear Implants

Affiliations

Health-Related Quality of Life Evaluation in Children with Cochlear Implants

Tugba Tulaci et al. J Int Adv Otol. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the quality of life scores of children with monoaural cochlear implants (CIs) aged 4-16 with those of normally hearing (NH) children and parents' reports. METHODS: The KINDL-R questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was delivered to 72 children aged 4-16 years and their parents. The children were divided into 3 subgroups of 4-7, 8-11, and 12-16 years and asked to report their quality of life from their own perspectives. The parents were divided into 2 subgroups for 4-7 aged and 8-16 aged children and were asked to report their child's quality of life status from their perspectives. The QoL scores of children with CI in the 3 subgroups were compared with the scores of their parents and NH peers. RESULTS: The total scores of children with CIs in all subgroups were significantly worse than NH peers. The total scores of parents and children with CIs in all subgroups revealed no statistically significant differences. In the correlation analysis, the age of implantation was negatively correlated with the total score both in 8-11 (ρ: -0.777) and 12-16 year subgroups (ρ: -0.591). Similarly, the implant usage duration was positively correlated with the total score in all age groups. CONCLUSION: Children with CI experience worse QoL status than their NH peers. The possible causes of the lower QoL scores following cochlear implantation must be investigated. Reports from parents on their children's QoL status are reliable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Similar articles

References

    1. O’Donoghue GM. . Cochlear implants in children: principles, practice and predictions. J R Soc Med. 1996;89(6):345 347. (doi: 10.1177/014107689608900617) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van den Broek P Cohen N O’Donoghue G Fraysse B Laszig R Offeciers E. . Cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;32(1 suppl):S217 S223. (doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(94)01162-q) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma AK Kumar M Kumar A Singh RK. . Institutional analysis of the surgical outcomes of cochlear implantation in deprived population. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e31853. (doi: 10.7759/cureus.31853) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vermi Sli Peker S Demi R Korkmaz F Cukurova I. . Quality of life and parental care burden in cochlear implanted children: a case-control study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;136:110164. (doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110164) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fletcher MD Cunningham RO Mills SR. . Electro-haptic enhancement of spatial hearing in cochlear implant users. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1621. (doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58503-8) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources