Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.70012. Online ahead of print.

The Dynamics of Caregiver Unpredictability Shape Moment-To-Moment Infant Looking During Dyadic Interaction

Affiliations

The Dynamics of Caregiver Unpredictability Shape Moment-To-Moment Infant Looking During Dyadic Interaction

Tess Allegra Forest et al. Child Dev. .

Abstract

Cognitive development is associated with how predictable caregivers are, but the mechanisms driving this are unclear. One possibility is caregiver predictability initially shapes how infants gather information for learning. Here, caregiver-infant dyads (N = 222, 2-6-months-old, all female caregivers; data collected 2022-2023) in South Africa and Malawi engaged in naturalistic play before their interactions were hand-annotated to measure caregiver predictability and infant gaze. In both countries, temporal variation in caregiver predictability shaped infant looking dynamics-infants attended to specific sensory signals (η2 = 0.04) and specific timepoints (η2 = 0.10) that were useful for them based on their caregiver's typical behavior. These findings provide a framework by which the predictability of caregiver behavior may shape fundamental, early optimization of visual attention for learning in infancy and later cognitive development.

Keywords: attention; child development; early environment; infancy; learning; non‐western populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aslin, R. N. 2017. “Statistical Learning: A Powerful Mechanism That Operates by Mere Exposure.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 8: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1373.
    1. Bates, D., M. Machler, B. M. Bolker, and S. C. Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed‐Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
    1. Ben‐Shachar, M. S., D. Lüdecke, and D. Makowski. 2020. “Effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters.” Journal of Open Source Software 5, no. 56: 2815. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02815.
    1. Berlyne, D. E., J. C. Ogilvie, and L. C. C. Parham. 1971. “The Dimensionality of Visual Complexity, Interestingness, and Pleasingness.” Canadian Journal of Psychology 25: 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00823811971.
    1. Birnie, M. T., and T. Z. Baram. 2022. “Principles of Emotional Brain Circuit Maturation.” Science 376: 1055–1056. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn4016.