Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;34(10):4377-4385.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09164-6. Epub 2025 Jul 21.

Diagnostic accuracy of the compression overload test versus straight leg Raise test in detecting lumbar disc herniation: an MRI-Validated Cross-Sectional study

Malini Madhesh  1 , Charu Eapen  2 , Parthasarathy Eappakkam Kumaraswamy  3 , Vijayakumar Palaniswamy  4
Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of the compression overload test versus straight leg Raise test in detecting lumbar disc herniation: an MRI-Validated Cross-Sectional study

Malini Madhesh et al. Eur Spine J. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the diagnostic performance of the Compression Overload Test (COLT) compared with the Straight Leg Raise Test (SLRT) in detecting lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH), using MRI as the reference standard. A secondary objective was to evaluate the correlation between each test and MRI results.

Method: Fifty-three 53 participants (mean age: 37.26 ± 12.16) with MRI-confirmed acute lumbar IVDH were included in the study. COLT and SLRT tests were conducted by the principal investigator, blinded to participant history, clinical findings, and MRI, while the co-investigator collected demographic and clinical data. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve measures.

Results: COLT demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield than SLRT, with a sensitivity of 92% and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 90.57%. It demonstrated moderate agreement with MRI findings (κ = 0.399) and a positive correlation (Φ = 0.428), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.793. In contrast, SLRT had no agreement (κ = -0.008) and no correlation (Φ = -0.0274) with MRI and a poor AUC (0.473). MRI predominantly identified L4-L5 herniations (47.5%) and disc bulges (54.5%). Vertebral endplate abnormalities, including Schmorl's nodes and Modic changes, were observed in 20 participants.

Conclusion: COLT showed higher diagnostic utility than SLRT and correlated well with MRI results.

Keywords: Intervertebral disc displacement; Low back pain; Magnetic resonance imaging. Lumbosacral region; ROC curve; Sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Shetty GM, Jain S, Thakur H, Khanna K (2022) Prevalence of low back pain in india: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work 73(2):429–452 - PubMed
    1. Sasi Kuppuswamy D, George JC, Chemmanam M (2017) Prevalence of lumbar disc herniation and disc degeneration in asymptomatic Indian subjects: an MRI-based study. Int J Orthop Sci 3:357–360 - DOI
    1. Gracovetsky SA, Iacono S (1987) Energy transfers in the spinal engine. J Biomed Eng 9(2):99–114 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Newell N, Little JP, Christou A, Adams MA, Adam CJ, Masouros SD (2017) Biomechanics of the human intervertebral disc: a review of testing techniques and results. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:420–434 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pouriesa M, Fouladi RF, Mesbahi S (2013) Disproportion of end plates and the lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine J 13(4):402–407 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources