Disulfidptosis-related LncRNA signatures in gastric cancer: regulation of MYH10-driven cytoskeletal remodeling and therapeutic implications
- PMID: 40694286
- DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-03160-4
Disulfidptosis-related LncRNA signatures in gastric cancer: regulation of MYH10-driven cytoskeletal remodeling and therapeutic implications
Abstract
Objective: Gastric cancer (GC), a widely recognized malignant neoplasm, poses significant treatment challenges. It is essential to pursue additional research to uncover novel therapeutic approaches and predictive methodologies. The phenomenon of disulfidptosis, recently identified as a distinct type of programmed cell death, offers intriguing possibilities for therapeutic applications.
Method: This study performed differential analysis, GO analysis, KEGG, GSEA, and other analyses to investigate the relationship between disulfidptosis-related LncRNAs (DRLs) and TCGA GC data. The analysis included 373 gastric cancer samples and 32 normal gastric tissue samples, obtained from [specify data source, e.g., TCGA, GEO, or in-house cohorts]. Samples were rigorously screened based on [criteria, e.g., histopathological confirmation, RNA quality, or clinical completeness], and transcriptomic data were processed using [specific tools or pipelines] to ensure reproducibility. A new, more accurate predictive model was constructed, identifying potential therapeutic targets, signaling pathways, and sensitive drugs.
Results: A refined prognostic signature associated with disulfidptosis in GC was developed through over 200 Lasso regression and MultiCox calculations. It was discovered that AL359182.1 and AC107021.2 could influence GC prognosis by modulating the MYH10/LIGHT JUNCTION or MYH10/REGULATION OF ACTIN CYTOSKELETON pathways. Notably, AL359182.1, newly identified as linked to GC prognosis, emerges as a potential novel therapeutic target. Furthermore, this study enhanced the accuracy of immunotherapy evaluations and screened for potential sensitive drugs.
Conclusion: Leveraging DRLs and TCGA GC data, this research identified highly precise prognostic signatures consisting of four LncRNAs: PINK1-AS, AC107021.2, AL359182.1, and AC009486.1. The discovery of two new signaling pathways could impact the prognosis of GC. AL359182.1 is proposed as a novel potential therapeutic target. The identified signature also effectively predicts the immunogenicity of GC and facilitates the screening of sensitive drugs. Further experimental validation is suggested to strengthen these conclusions.
Keywords: Disulfidptosis; Gastric cancer; Immunity; Prognosis; Signature; Therapeutic target.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
A novel copper-induced cell death-related lncRNA prognostic signature associated with immune infiltration and clinical value in gastric cancer.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10543-10559. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04916-7. Epub 2023 Jun 8. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37291405 Free PMC article.
-
Multidisciplinary analysis of the prognosis and biological function of NUBPL in gastric cancer.Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 5;16:1603898. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1603898. eCollection 2025. Front Immunol. 2025. PMID: 40539058 Free PMC article.
-
Multi‑cohort Validation Based on Disulfidptosis-Related lncRNAs for Predicting Prognosis and Immunotherapy Response of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Onco Targets Ther. 2025 Jun 25;18:763-778. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S519270. eCollection 2025. Onco Targets Ther. 2025. PMID: 40589861 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
References
-
- Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2020;396:635–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31288-5 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chia NY, Tan P. Molecular classification of gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:763–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw040 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yang X, et al. Temporal trend of gastric cancer burden along with its risk factors in China from 1990 to 2019, and projections until 2030: comparison with Japan, South Korea, and Mongolia. Biomarker Res. 2021;9:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00340-6 . - DOI
-
- Wu SL, Zhang Y, Fu Y, Li J, Wang JS. Gastric cancer incidence, mortality and burden in adolescents and young adults: a time-trend analysis and comparison among China, South Korea Japan and the USA. BMJ Open. 2022;12: e061038. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061038 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Guan WL, He Y, Xu RH. Gastric cancer treatment: recent progress and future perspectives. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01451-3 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous