Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0328654.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328654. eCollection 2025.

Assessment of tannery effluents quality treated by electrocoagulation and ozonation: Physicochemical and ecotoxicological characterization

Affiliations

Assessment of tannery effluents quality treated by electrocoagulation and ozonation: Physicochemical and ecotoxicological characterization

Edwar Aguilar-Ascón et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Tannery effluents are characterized by their high toxicity and complex pollutant load, posing significant risks to aquatic ecosystems. Although conventional treatment processes often achieve regulatory standards for pollutant concentrations, they do not necessarily guarantee the reduction of effluent toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of tannery effluents treated by electrocoagulation (EC) and the combined electrocoagulation-ozonation (ECO) process, while analyzing the associated toxicity reduction, in order to determine the suitability of these technologies for application and ensure environmental protection of receiving water bodies. For this purpose, tannery wastewater was treated sequentially using an electrocoagulation reactor followed by an ozonation system, yielding three sample types: raw (C), electrocoagulation-treated (EC), and electrocoagulation-ozonation treated (ECO). Physicochemical parameters were measured, toxicity was assessed through bioassays with Lactuca sativa and Eisenia fetida, and chemical changes were analyzed using FTIR spectroscopy.EC achieved 96.4% removal of total suspended solids (TSS), 30.9% of chemical oxygen demand (COD), and 99% of chromium, while ozonation further removed 10% of COD and 99% of sulfides. Toxicity assays indicated a reduction from 23.89 toxicity units (TUs) in the raw effluent to 8.32 TUs after EC and 11.12 TUs after ECO. The slight increase in toxicity after ozonation was associated with elevated ammoniacal nitrogen levels and the formation of new functional groups, as evidenced by the FTIR spectrum. Despite significant pollutant removal, the results highlight that treated effluents may still present residual toxicity, emphasizing the need for complementary treatment strategies to achieve true environmental safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental design and analytical.
methods used for the physicochemical and ecotoxicological characterization of tannery effluents.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Schematic of the integrated treatment system.
(1) Electrocoagulation reactor, (2) Power supply, (3) Aluminum electrodes, (4) Ozonizer, (5) Ozonation tank, (6) Diffusers, (7) Receiving tank.
Fig 3
Fig 3. AG and GI for Lactuca sativa toxicity test.
(2a) Absolute Germination (AG) for each sample at different concentrations. (2b) Germination Index (GI) for each sample at different concentrations with GI classification limits.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Correlation heatmap for physicochemical parameters characterized.
For C, EC and ECO samples.
Fig 5
Fig 5. PCA for physicochemical characterization.
EC50 and TU of C, EC and ECO samples.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Number of surviving earthworms per concentration.
From left to right, the results are shown for samples C (raw effluent), EC (raw effluent treated with electrocoagulation), and ECO (raw effluent treated with electrocoagulation and ozonation).
Fig 7
Fig 7. FTIR spectra for the NC.
Corresponding to garden soil, and for the treatments with 100 mL aliquots of samples C, EC, and ECO mixed with the NC, after exposure to earthworms for three weeks.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hira A, Pacini H, Attafuah-Wadee K, Sikander M, Oruko R, Dinan A. Mitigating Tannery Pollution in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Journal of Developing Societies. 2022;38(3):360–83. doi: 10.1177/0169796x221104856 - DOI
    1. Lofrano G, Meriç S, Zengin GE, Orhon D. Chemical and biological treatment technologies for leather tannery chemicals and wastewaters: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2013;461–462:265–81. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holt PK, Barton GW, Mitchell CA. The future for electrocoagulation as a localised water treatment technology. Chemosphere. 2005;59(3):355–67. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aguilar-Ascon E, Marrufo-Saldaña L, Barra-Hinojosa J. Toxicity assessment of tanning effluents treated via electrocoagulation and ozonation using a bioassay with Lactuca sativa L. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2024;25(9).
    1. Rahman NA, Jol CJ, Linus AA, Ismail V. Emerging application of electrocoagulation for tropical peat water treatment: A review. Chem Eng Process -Process Intensif. 2021;165:108449. doi: CrossRef