Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22;5(7):e0004929.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004929. eCollection 2025.

Who has sheds? Exploring practices and determinants of overnight housing for backyard poultry in rural Bangladesh to inform an intervention to limit exposure to poultry and poultry feces

Affiliations

Who has sheds? Exploring practices and determinants of overnight housing for backyard poultry in rural Bangladesh to inform an intervention to limit exposure to poultry and poultry feces

Elizabeth D Thomas et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Backyard poultry-rearing contributes to income and food security for rural households in low- and middle-income countries. However, poultry are often kept inside the household dwelling at night, posing health risks to the people raising them. Housing poultry separately from the dwelling overnight is a potential intervention to limit exposure to poultry. The aim of this study was to describe practices and determinants of overnight poultry housing in rural Bangladesh as formative research for an intervention to separate young children from poultry and poultry feces. We conducted 19 transect walks in villages across Bangladesh to document overnight housing practices among backyard poultry raisers. We then conducted 27 semi-structured interviews to explore poultry-raising practices, including housing types and materials identified during transect walks. We found overnight poultry housing both inside and separate from the dwelling and found that most poultry raisers who kept their birds separate from the dwelling overnight did so in courtyard sheds. There was a preference and willingness to house birds outside, provided a shed was available, although overnight housing practices fluctuated. Having a shed was a function of household resources, including availability and access to materials and skilled labor, available physical space, area- and village-wide trends, and the preferences and concerns of poultry raisers. We recommend that future studies measuring human exposure to poultry and poultry feces assess exposure prospectively and at regular intervals to capture variations in housing practice, and include assessments of poultry housing hygiene practices. The promotion of sheds for overnight poultry housing may be an acceptable intervention approach in this setting, though programs will need to make recommendations for housing that address the risk of zoonotic disease transmission and accommodate the preferences and constraints of poultry raisers over a one-size-fits-all approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: 1. Mahbub-Ul Alam is an Editorial Board member at PLOS Global Public Health.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Research sites and activities.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Examples illustrating variation in design and materials for sheds documented during transect walks.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Poultry housing identified inside the household dwelling and separate from the household dwelling.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Strengths and weaknesses of different shed designs.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Framework of factors influencing overnight poultry-housing practices in rural Bangladesh.

Similar articles

References

    1. Alders RG, Pym RAE. Village poultry: still important to millions, eight thousand years after domestication. World Poultry Sci J. 2009;65(2):181–90. doi: 10.1017/s0043933909000117 - DOI
    1. Alders RG, Dumas SE, Rukambile E, Magoke G, Maulaga W, Jong J, et al. Family poultry: Multiple roles, systems, challenges, and options for sustainable contributions to household nutrition security through a planetary health lens. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(Suppl 3):e12668. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12668 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mack S, Hoffmann D, Otte J. The contribution of poultry to rural development. World Poultry Sci J. 2005;61(1):7–14. doi: 10.1079/wps200436 - DOI
    1. Dolberg F. Poultry production for livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Poultry in the 21st century Avian influenza and beyond. Bangkok, Thailand; 2007.
    1. Azzarri C, Zezza A, Haile B, Cross E. Does Livestock Ownership Affect Animal Source Foods Consumption and Child Nutritional Status? Evidence from Rural Uganda. J Develop Stud. 2015;51(8):1034–59. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1018905 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources