A multi-detector analytical approach for characterizing complex botanical extracts: a case study on ashwagandha
- PMID: 40695986
- PMCID: PMC12367915
- DOI: 10.1007/s00216-025-06006-8
A multi-detector analytical approach for characterizing complex botanical extracts: a case study on ashwagandha
Abstract
A comprehensive analytical characterization of botanical extracts can be difficult due to their complexity, dynamic range, and limited availability of constituent standards. By using ashwagandha root extract as a case study, this work showcases how to characterize a botanical extract utilizing an analytical system with multiple detectors to support the development of toxicological tools for evaluating botanicals. The platform incorporated ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled with photodiode array (PDA) detection, charged aerosol detection (CAD), and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) detection to generate a detailed chemical profile. This multi-detector platform enabled both semi-quantification and the identification of the majority of constituents, ensuring accurate chemical analysis while compensating for potential detector biases. The approach provided a thorough fingerprint of the ashwagandha extract, enabling authentication of the material. The generation of a comprehensive fingerprint supports in silico modeling and bioassay-based toxicological evaluations of botanicals, particularly in the context of dietary supplement safety. This study demonstrated the utility of detailed chemical analysis supporting the authenticity of ashwagandha root extract and the advancement of tools needed for robust safety assessments of botanical products by providing the semi-quantification and identification of over 60 constituents in ashwagandha extracts.
Keywords: Ashwagandha root extract; Complex mixtures; Multi-detector platform; Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: N/A. Statement on animal welfare: N/A. Source of biological material: N/A. Conflict of interest: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The following authors are employed in the personal care product industry (at the time of article submission): V.S. and T.B. The opinions presented here are those of the authors. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Smith, T., C. Lang, and E. Craft, US sales of herbal supplements increase 4.4% in 2023. HerbalGram, 2024(141).
-
- Carreno-Quintero, N. and P.D. Cárdenas, Plants: the master chemists of our planet.
-
- Böttger, A., et al., Plant secondary metabolites and their general function in plants. Lessons on caffeine, cannabis & co: plant-derived drugs and their interaction with human receptors, 2018: p. 3–17.
-
- Mitchell CA, et al. The Botanical Safety Consortium: a public-private partnership to enhance the botanical safety toolkit. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022;128: 105090. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
