Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 23;8(1):59.
doi: 10.1186/s42155-025-00575-6.

A fifteen-year retrospective analysis of varicocele embolization: evaluating success, recurrence rates and embolic agents

Affiliations

A fifteen-year retrospective analysis of varicocele embolization: evaluating success, recurrence rates and embolic agents

Meadhbh Ni Mhiochain de Grae et al. CVIR Endovasc. .

Abstract

Introduction: A varicocele is a venous dilatation due to valvular incompetence within the pampiniform plexus, affecting 10-20% of the population and found in 40% of men with primary infertility (Hum Reprod Update 7(1):59-64, 2001, Cochrane Database System Rev (3), 2004, Curr Urol 6(1):33-6, 2012, World J Men's Health 37(1):4, 2019). Varicocele associated pain occurs in 2-10% of cases (Hum Reprod Update 7(1):59-64, 2001, SpringerPlus 4:1-5, 2015). Treatment options include conservative management, percutaneous embolization, or surgery (Urology 72(1):77-80, 2008). In the literature, percutaneous embolization has a technical failure rate ranging from 0 to 13.9% and recurrence rates of around 13% (Cochrane Database System Rev 4(4):CD000479, 2021). This study evaluates the success and recurrence of percutaneous varicocele embolizations over fifteen years and compares the embolic materials used.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of all adult patients who underwent varicocele embolization performed from April 2008 to February 2023 in two tertiary centres. Data collected included patient age, procedure date, access site, side of occurrence, previous interventions, treatment method, need for re-intervention, and recurrence rates. We defined technical success as successful access to the gonadal vein and embolization of same with coil/sclerosant. We assessed clinical success through follow-up telephone consultations and ultrasound.

Results: The technical and clinical success rate was 96% and 93.75%, respectively. Of 225 patients, 3.12% had prior failed surgeries, all were treated successfully with IR, and only 0.89% required further surgical intervention. Patients reported recurrence rate of 25% of cases during telephone follow-up. However, the confirmed actual recurrence rate based on ultrasound was only 6.25%. The complication rate was low (1.78%), with no major events. Among patients treated for subfertility, 51.35% achieved successful conception following percutaneous embolization. Outcomes did not significantly differ based on the type of embolic material used.

Conclusion: Percutaneous embolization is a safe, effective, and durable treatment for varicocele, demonstrating high technical and clinical success regardless of embolic material used with a low recurrence rate over long-term follow-up. It remains effective even in cases of prior failed surgical repair and is associated with promising fertility outcomes. These findings support embolization as a first-line treatment in varicocele management.

Keywords: Embolization; Fertility; Infertility; Interventional; Male; Percutaneous procedures; Radiology; Recurrence; Sclerosing solutions; Treatment outcome; Varicocele; Vascular surgical procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. This study obtained IRB approval from our hospital. Consent for publication: Consent to publish was obtained from participants in this study. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(1):59–64. - PubMed
    1. Evers JL, Collins J. Surgery or embolisation for varicocele in subfertile men. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2004(3). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15266431/. - PubMed
    1. Abd Ellatif ME, Asker W, Abbas A, Negm A, Al-Katary M, El-Kaffas H, et al. Varicocelectomy to treat pain, and predictors of success: a prospective study. Curr Urol. 2012;6(1):33–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paick S, Choi WS. Varicocele and testicular pain: a review. World J Men’s Health. 2019;37(1):4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muthuveloe DW, During V, Ashdown D, Rukin NJ, Jones RG, Patel P. The effectiveness of varicocele embolisation for the treatment of varicocele related orchalgia. Springerplus. 2015;4:1–5. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources