Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22;22(1):101.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01782-z.

Association between child and youth physical activity and family functioning: a systematic review of observational studies

Yasmine Forghani Soong  1 , Heather Hollman  2 , Ryan E Rhodes  2
Affiliations

Association between child and youth physical activity and family functioning: a systematic review of observational studies

Yasmine Forghani Soong et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: There are numerous psychosocial and health benefits linked to physical activity; however, 80% of children and youth are not meeting the recommended guidelines. Genetics, socio-economic status and familial factors impact childhood movement behaviors. In particular, active families support well developed and resilient offspring. As the family unit is optimally placed during a critical time in development, it is pertinent to explore the relationship between family functioning and child and youth physical activity.

Purpose: To synthesize and analyze the literature to determine the associations between general domains of family functioning (general family functioning, cohesion, communication, conflict, organization, family problem-solving ability, household chaos, and affective environment) and child and youth (children: aged five to 12, youth: aged 13 to 17) physical activity.

Methods: Literature searches across six databases were performed.

Inclusion: Studies that performed and presented a statistical analysis between direct measurements of child and youth physical activity and general domains of family functioning.

Exclusion: Indirect measurements of family functioning (e.g., support and encouragement). The summary median effect sizes (Pearson r) and interquartile range [IQR] were calculated between child or youth physical activity and each family functioning domain.

Results: Search results k = 12,999. Included articles k = 43. Child physical activity had a small median effect size and indeterminate association with general family functioning (r = 0.09; [IQR]: -0.06 to 0.09) and cohesion (r = 0.06; [IQR]: 0.05 to 0.22). Youth physical activity presented with small median effect sizes and significant positive associations with the domains of general family functioning (r = 0.04; [IQR]: 0.02 to 0.06), cohesion (r = 0.09; [IQR]: 0.07 to 0.14), communication (r = 0.17; [IQR]: 0.09 to 0.40), and a negative association with the domain of conflict (r = -0.09; [IQR]: -0.21 to 0.02). Family problem-solving ability, organization, household chaos, and affective environment were understudied across both age groups.

Conclusions: A small effect size in the domains of cohesion, communication, and conflict highlights the association between child and youth physical activity and family functioning. These findings provide a new avenue for researchers, programmers, and policy writers to target to support child and youth physical activity.

Trial registration: This review is registered with The National Institute for Health and Care Research at The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). PROSPERO ID number is CRD42023454220.

Keywords: Children; Family functioning; Physical activity; Youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flow Diagram. Source inclusion process. Adapted from PRISMA Statement, Page et al. [44].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(1):40--. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pate RR, Hillman C, Janz K, Katzmarzyk PT, Powell KE, Torres A, et al. Physical activity and health in children under 6 years of age: A systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1282–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, Carson V, Chaput J-P, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2016;41(6 (Suppl. 3)):S197-239. - PubMed
    1. Christoffersen T, Winther A, Nilsen OA, Ahmed LA, Furberg A-S, Grimnes G, et al. Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures. BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2015;7(1):26-. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Álvarez-Bueno C, Pesce C, Cavero-Redondo I, Sánchez-López M, Martínez-Hortelano JA, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. The effect of physical activity interventions on children’s cognition and metacognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(9):729–38. - PubMed

Publication types