Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 8:16:1617089.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1617089. eCollection 2025.

Sociodemographic markers of high Sensory Processing Sensitivity: a descriptive study

Affiliations

Sociodemographic markers of high Sensory Processing Sensitivity: a descriptive study

María-Luz Morales-Botello et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) represents a personality trait characterised by heightened responsiveness to environmental stimuli, which can lead to both beneficial and adverse outcomes. Despite the exponential growth in knowledge about SPS in recent years, sociodemographic dimension related to this trait remains under-researched. The primary aim of this study was to analyse and provide deeper insights into the sociodemographic characteristics that may distinguish highly sensitive individuals. The present study was approached from the perspective of different sensitivity levels (low-SPS, medium-SPS and high-SPS).

Methods: To examine the sociodemographic expression of SPS, we pursued two main objectives. Firstly, by logistic regression analysis, we investigated the sociodemographic characteristics that predict high-SPS. Secondly, by analysis of variance and post hoc analysis, we investigated whether the relationship between SPS and sociodemographic variables depended on the SPS level. We conducted these analyses based on a large sample from the general population (9,447 participants were initially considered).

Results: The logistic regression analysis identified significant predictors of high sensitivity, spanning demographic, social, and wellbeing-related variables. Specifically, gender, age, civil status, number of children and type of residence as demographic variables; number of social groups and satisfaction with partner as social variables; and practise of body awareness activities as a wellbeing variable significantly predicted high-SPS. Moreover, analysis of variance and post hoc analysis, evidenced that unlike low-SPS and medium-SPS, high-SPS (SPS trait) was relatively stable with respect to sociodemographic changes.

Discussion: We discuss our findings within the context of SPS, personality traits, and their practical implications for clinical, educational, and occupational settings. We hope that this work will contribute to identifying those who may need greater support in developing their wellbeing.

Keywords: Sensory Processing Sensitivity; descriptive study; health; personality trait; sensitivity levels; sociodemographic characteristics; wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean scores of SPS factors, segregated by level of sensitivity (low, medium, high), across categories of the variables “Age” (A) and “Educational level” (B). SOS, Sensitivity to Overstimulation; AES, Aesthetic Sensitivity; LST, Low Sensory Threshold; HA, Harm Avoidance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean scores of SPS factors, segregated by level of sensitivity (low, medium, high), across categories of the variables “Number of social groups” (A), “Experience within social groups” (B) and “Satisfaction with partner” (C). SOS, Sensitivity to Overstimulation; AES, Aesthetic Sensitivity; LST, Low Sensory Threshold; FPD, Fine Psychophysiological Discrimination; HA, Harm Avoidance.

Similar articles

References

    1. Acevedo B. P., Aron E. N., Aron A., Sangster M.-D., Collins N., Brown L. L. (2014). The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others' emotions. Brain Behav. 4, 580–594. 10.1002/brb3.242 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agenor C., Conner N., Aroian K. (2017). Flourishing: an Evolutionary Concept Analysis. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 38, 915–923. 10.1080/01612840.2017.1355945 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahadi B., Basharpoor S. (2010). Relationship between sensory processing sensitivity, personality dimensions and mental health. J. Appl. Sci. 10, 570574. 10.3923/jas.2010.570.574 - DOI
    1. Al-Halabí S., Herrero R., Saiz P. A., García-Portilla M. P., Corcoran P., Bascaran M. T., et al. (2010). Sociodemographic factors associated with personality traits assessed through the TCI. Pers. Individ. Dif. 48, 809–814. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.001 - DOI
    1. Andresen M., Goldmann P., Volodina A. (2018). Do overwhelmed expatriates intend to leave? The effects of sensory processing sensitivity, stress, and social capital on expatriates' turnover intention. Eur. Manag. Rev. 15, 315–328. 10.1111/emre.12120 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources