Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 8:15:1597401.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1597401. eCollection 2025.

The role of ratio markers based on prealbumin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Affiliations

The role of ratio markers based on prealbumin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Qianqian Cao et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following total joint arthroplasty, and the timeliness of its diagnosis and treatment is crucial for patient recovery. Although various biomarkers have been extensively evaluated and applied in clinical practice, the diagnosis of PJI remains challenging. Therefore, it is necessary to identify more precise biomarkers for the diagnosis of PJI. This study aims to investigate the value of ratio-based biomarkers using prealbumin (PA) for the diagnosis of PJI.

Methods: This study compared the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen (FIB), PA, CRP/PA (CPR), ESR/PA (EPR), FIB/PA (FPR), and the combined ratio of CPR+EPR+FPR(CEF) in 180 patients with PJI and 105 patients with aseptic loosening (AL) who presented at our department from January 2019 to December 2024. The diagnostic efficacy of these markers in PJI diagnosis was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: Among these biomarkers, CPR has the highest AUC of 0.921 (95%CI 0.890-0.952), and it can distinguish PJI with a cut-off value of 0.0366, a sensitivity of 76.1%, and a specificity of 95.2%. In the diabetic subgroup, the combined biomarker CEF has an AUC of 0.951 for diagnosing PJI, with a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 94.4%.

Conclusion: Ratio-based markers based on PA show promise as valuable new adjunctive diagnostic markers for PJI.

Keywords: aseptic loosening; diabetes; marker; periprosthetic joint infection; prealbumin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of levels of different markers between the PJI group and the AL group. Statistical significance: ***P<0.001. CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FIB, fibrinogen; PA, prealbumin; CPR, CRP/PA; EPR, ESR/PA; FPR, FIB/PA; CEF, CPR+EPR+FPR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The ROC curves of CRP, ESR, FIB, PA, CPR, EPR, FPR, and CEF. CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FIB, fibrinogen; PA, prealbumin; CPR, CRP/PA; EPR, ESR/PA; FPR, FIB/PA; CEF, CPR+EPR+FPR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Among the diabetes subgroups, the levels of different markers in the PJI group and the AL group. CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FIB, fibrinogen; PA, prealbumin; CPR, CRP/PA; EPR, ESR/PA; FPR, FIB/PA; CEF, CPR+EPR+FPR. Statistical significance: ***P<0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The ROC curves of CRP, ESR, FIB, PA, CPR, EPR, FPR, and CEF in the diabetes subgroups. CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FIB, fibrinogen; PA, prealbumin; CPR, CRP/PA; EPR, ESR/PA; FPR, FIB/PA; CEF, CPR+EPR+FPR.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ang L. C., Debowski T., Michalski R. (1991). Immunolocalization of prealbumin (transthyretin) in renal cell carcinoma. Histopathology 18, 565–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb01487.x, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanco J. F., Díaz A., Melchor F. R., da Casa C., Pescador D. (2020). Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty. Arch. Orthop Trauma Surg. 140, 239–245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03304-6, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandy S., Joseph K., Sankaranarayanan A., Issac A., Babu G., Wilson B., et al. (2017). Evaluation of c-reactive protein and fibrinogen in patients with chronic and aggressive periodontitis: A clinico-biochemical study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 11, Zc41–Zzc5. doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/23100.9552, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christopher Z. K., McQuivey K. S., Deckey D. G., Haglin J., Spangehl M. J., Bingham J. S. (2021). Acute or chronic periprosthetic joint infection? Using the esr/crp ratio to aid in determining the acuity of periprosthetic joint infections. J. Bone Jt Infect. 6, 229–234. doi: 10.5194/jbji-6-229-2021, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deng L., Wang J., Yang G. Y., Hou Y. Z., Li K. W., Sun B., et al. (2024). Different biomarker ratios in peripheral blood have limited value in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: A single-center, retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 25, 377. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07499-7, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources