Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 8:12:1623286.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1623286. eCollection 2025.

Multidimensional predictive model for assessing clinical activity in thyroid eye disease

Affiliations

Multidimensional predictive model for assessing clinical activity in thyroid eye disease

Yang Li et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune disorder with complex inflammatory activity that remains challenging to assess accurately. Current method, mainly the Clinical Activity Score (CAS), exhibits limitations in objectivity and comprehensiveness. This study aimed to develop a multidimensional predictive model integrating clinical parameters, SPECT/CT imaging data, and serum biomarkers, to improve TED activity evaluation.

Methods: This retrospective research included 36 TED patients (72 eyes) diagnosed by EUGOGO criteria who underwent SPECT/CT examination. The Clinical Activity Score (CAS) was used to evaluate inflammatory activity. Variables with significant associations with CAS-defined activity were identified using univariate analysis, and Bayesian shrinkage regression (BSR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were utilized for variable selection in the primary cohort. Predictive models were constructed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (internally validated via five-fold cross-validation), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves.

Results: Five predictive models were constructed. The comprehensive Model 4, combining clinical, imaging [EX, maximal SPECT/CT uptake ratio (URmax)], and serum biomarkers (TRAb, RBC), achieved superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 91.18%; sensitivity: 0.91; specificity: 0.86). Model 5, retaining variables significant in univariate and multivariate analyses, demonstrated robust performance (AUC: 85.97%) with superior stability during cross-validation (ROC mean: 0.8417). Key predictors included male sex (OR = 11.74), TRAb levels, EX, URmax, and RBC count. SPECT/CT-derived URmax correlated strongly with disease activity, while serum biomarkers complemented imaging limitations.

Conclusion: Multidimensional integration of clinical, imaging, and biomarker data significantly enhances TED activity evaluation compared to single-modality approaches. The multidimensional model offers superior diagnostic accuracy, addressing the limitations of conventional methods. These findings advocate for a holistic approach in TED management.

Keywords: SPECT/CT; clinical activity score; multidimensional model; serum biomarkers; thyroid eye disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The comprehensive workflow of this research.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative unilateral radiographic manifestations of active and inactive TED defined by CAS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variables for predicting model screening results. (A,B) Variables screening based on the LASSO regression. (C) Variables screening based on the BSR. (D) Variables selected from both univariate and regression analyses with statistical significance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) ROC curve of multidimensional predictive models. AUC, area under the curve. (B) DCA of multidimensional predictive models. (C,D) Calibration curve of multidimensional predictive models.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The five-fold cross-validation performance.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kulbay M, Tanya SM, Tuli N, Dahoud J, Dahoud A, Alsaleh F, et al. A comprehensive review of thyroid eye disease pathogenesis: from immune dysregulations to novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:11628. doi: 10.3390/ijms252111628, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spadaro JZ, Kohli AA. Pathogenesis of thyroid eye disease. Int Ophthalmol Clin. (2023) 63:65–80. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000464, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiler DL. Thyroid eye disease: a review. Clin Exp Optom. (2017) 100:20–5. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12472, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moledina M, Damato EM, Lee V. The changing landscape of thyroid eye disease: current clinical advances and future outlook. Eye. (2024) 38:1425–37. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-02967-9, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burch HB, Perros P, Bednarczuk T, Cooper DS, Dolman PJ, Leung AM, et al. Management of thyroid eye disease: a consensus statement by the American Thyroid Association and the European Thyroid Association. Thyroid. (2022) 32:1439–70. doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0251, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources