Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 12:86:103345.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103345. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation plus pregabalin for radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain in patients with head and neck cancer (RELAX): a phase 2 randomised trial

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation plus pregabalin for radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain in patients with head and neck cancer (RELAX): a phase 2 randomised trial

Xuzheng Zuo et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Rapid relief of radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain (RRNP) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors is challenging when relying solely on pharmacologic treatments, especially in the early stages of medication. Whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) can effectively and rapidly control the RRNP in HNC survivors remains uncertain.

Methods: The RELAX trial was a randomised, parallel, sham-controlled trial conducted at four centres in China. We randomly assigned (1:1) HNC survivors with moderate-to-severe RRNP (as defined by Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] score of ≥4) to receive taVNS or sham stimulation (concha of the left ear) for 30 min twice daily over 7 days. Participants, outcome assessors, and statisticians were blinded to assignment and intervention. All patients also received a basal dose of pregabalin (75 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was pain intensity reduction, as measured by the change of NRS scores from baseline to day 7. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05543239.

Findings: Between September 16, 2022, and December 1, 2023, 116 eligible patients (mean age, 50.8 [standard deviation (SD), 8.8] years; 40 [34.5%] were women) were randomly assigned into groups. All patients completed NRS score at baseline and day 7, and 112 (96.6%) completed 80% or more of the intervention course. The pain intensity at baseline was 5.79 (SD, 1.59) in the taVNS group and 5.66 (SD, 1.54) in the control group. At day 7, pain intensity decreased by 2.43 (SD, 2.19) in the taVNS group and 1.12 (SD, 1.64) in the Control group; between-group difference, 1.31 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-2.02; P = 0.00042). The most common adverse event (AE) related to taVNS was mild, transient local skin irritations at the electrode site (8.6% versus 1.7%, P = 0.21), and no serious AE were associated with the device.

Interpretation: In this trial, taVNS for 7 days at the initial stage of pregabalin treatment resulted in significantly better pain relief in HNC survivors with moderate-to-severe RRNP with no serious AE. Further prospective investigations to observe the longer term effects of taVNS on RRNP are warranted.

Funding: This study was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province and Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau.

Keywords: Head and neck cancer; Pregabalin; Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain; Randomised clinical trial; Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of taVNS on Pain Intensity. Panels A show the NRS score changes (primary outcome). ∗∗ indicates that there is significant difference in the NRS score changes between groups (P < 0.00042). Outliers (○) defined as values beyond Mean-2 × SD or Mean + 2 × SD. Panels B show the percentage change in pain intensity (based on NRS score) from baseline to Day 7. The red and green dashed lines indicate a reduction in pain intensity of 30% and 50%, respectively. Panels C and D show the outcome of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Day 7 by Treatment Group. NRS denotes numeric rating scale (range from 0 to 10, higher scores indicating greater pain). NOTE: N = 116 samples (taVNS: Control = 1:1).

Similar articles

References

    1. Mañas A., Monroy J.L., Ramos A.A., et al. Prevalence of neuropathic pain in radiotherapy oncology units. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:511–520. - PubMed
    1. Delanian S., Lefaix J.L., Pradat P.F. Radiation induced neuropathy in cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105:273–282. - PubMed
    1. Epstein J.B., Wilkie D.J., Fischer D.J., Kim Y.O., Villines D. Neuropathic and nociceptive pain in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Head Neck Oncol. 2009;1:26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang J., Li Y., Shen Q., et al. Effect of pregabalin on radiotherapyrelated neuropathic pain in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:135–143. - PubMed
    1. Finnerup N.B., Attal N., Haroutounian S., et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):162–173. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources