Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis in Steatotic Liver Disease Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction (UDFF) and Auto pSWE by Using Deep Abdominal Transducer (DAX) and Liver Biopsy Correlation
- PMID: 40698670
- DOI: 10.1002/jum.70005
Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis in Steatotic Liver Disease Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction (UDFF) and Auto pSWE by Using Deep Abdominal Transducer (DAX) and Liver Biopsy Correlation
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) in detecting and grading hepatosteatosis using liver histology as the reference, and to assess the effectiveness of point shear wave elastography (pSWE), UDFF, and auto-pSWE in diagnosing steatohepatitis and detecting fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).
Methods: In this prospective study, patients underwent liver biopsy following UDFF and pSWE measurements using deep abdominal transducer (DAX) and conventional abdominal probes by 2 operators. Imaging findings were compared with histopathology to assess diagnostic performance. Associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS), fibrosis stage, and imaging parameters were also evaluated.
Results: A total of 121 patients were included. The median age was 50 years, and 57 (41%) were male. Histology confirmed steatotic liver disease in 43 cases. Excellent interobserver agreement was observed for UDFF (ICC = 0.974), pSWE (ICC = 0.958), and auto-pSWE (ICC = 0.960). UDFF showed a stepwise increase with steatosis grade and was moderately correlated with histological fat content (r = 0.676 for Sonographer 1, r = 0.638 for Sonographer 2; P < .001). For detecting S ≥ 1 steatosis, the optimal UDFF thresholds were ≥8.4% (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.968; Se = 92.5%, Sp = 93.2%) for Sonographer 1 and ≥8.6% (AUC = 0.951; Se = 90.0%, Sp = 86.3%) for Sonographer 2. For moderate steatosis (S ≥ 2), the cutoffs were ≥10.4% (AUC = 0.932; Se = 100%, Sp = 79.6%) and ≥10.6% (AUC = 0.925; Se = 100%, Sp = 76.5%), and for severe steatosis (S = 3), ≥18.3% (AUC = 0.961; Se = 100%, Sp = 77.4%) and ≥18.7% (AUC = 0.949; Se = 100%, Sp = 77.4%) for Sonographer 1 and 2, respectively. UDFF positively correlated with body mass index and subcutaneous fat thickness, and negatively with both pSWE and auto-pSWE. A strong correlation was observed between pSWE and auto-pSWE for both observers. A weak positive correlation was found between NAS and auto-pSWE in MASLD cases. The optimal thresholds to detect fibrosis (≥F1) were 5.05 and 4.95 kPa for Sonographer 1, and 5.05 and 4.85 kPa for Sonographer 2, for pSWE and auto-pSWE measurements, respectively.
Conclusion: DAX-derived UDFF and auto-pSWE are reproducible, noninvasive biomarkers with strong diagnostic value in assessing steatosis and fibrosis in MASLD.
Keywords: deep abdominal transducer (DAX); fibrosis; liver biopsy; quantitative ultrasound; steatotic liver disease; ultrasound‐derived fat fraction (UDFF).
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
UDFF and Auto pSWE accurately assess liver steatosis and fibrosis risk in obese patients with MASLD.Ultraschall Med. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1055/a-2592-1431. Online ahead of print. Ultraschall Med. 2025. PMID: 40774298 English.
-
Assessment of hepatic steatosis in children with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease using ultrasound derived fat fraction: first large-scale clinical evaluation.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):5582-5592. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2393. Epub 2025 May 30. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025. PMID: 40606360 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Liver Fibrosis with Multisample Point Shear Wave Elastography in Obese Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Acad Radiol. 2025 Sep;32(9):5150-5161. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.070. Epub 2025 May 19. Acad Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40393826
-
Comparing FIB-4, VCTE, pSWE, 2D-SWE, and MRE Thresholds and Diagnostic Accuracies for Detecting Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 24;15(13):1598. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131598. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40647597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic performance of point shear wave elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography in paediatric metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e087101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087101. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40527553 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Hepatology 2023; 78:1966–1986. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000520.
-
- Younossi ZM, Golabi P, Paik JM, Henry A, Van Dongen C, Henry L. The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review. Hepatology 2023; 77:1335–1347. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000004.
-
- Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 2012; 142:1592–1609. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.GASTRO.2012.04.001.
-
- Rinella ME, Neuschwander‐Tetri BA, Siddiqui MS, et al. AASLD practice guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2023; 77:1797–1835. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323.
-
- Saadeh S, Younossi ZM, Remer EM, et al. The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:745–750. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.35354.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources