Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jul 18:23:eRW1134.
doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025RW1134. eCollection 2025.

Inspiratory muscle training for chronic critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Gustavo Rodrigues das Chagas  1 , Aléxia Gabriela da Silva Vieira  1 , Jamile Caroline Garbuglio de Araújo  1 , Raquel Afonso Caserta Eid  1 , Caroline Gomes Mól  1 , Ricardo Kenji Nawa  1   2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Inspiratory muscle training for chronic critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Gustavo Rodrigues das Chagas et al. Einstein (Sao Paulo). .

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review and analyze studies investigating the efficacy and safety of inspiratory muscle training in adult chronic critically ill patients.

Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, LILACS, Clinical Trials Registry, and World Health Organization databases were queried on November 24, 2022 and January 22, 2025. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. RevMan V5.4 was used to analyze mean differences or standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for continuous variables and risk ratios with 95%CIs for dichotomous outcomes. The primary outcomes were inspiratory muscle strength, duration of mechanical ventilation, and severe adverse events; the secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive care unit mortality, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, pulmonary function, non-serious adverse events, respiratory muscle mass, and functional status.

Results: Seven studies (n=390 participants) were included in the analysis. There was a significant increase in inspiratory muscle strength with inspiratory muscle training versus usual care (mean difference, -8.37; 95%CI= -15.21 to -1.52), although the certainty of evidence was very low; when compared with sham interventions, there was no significant difference (mean difference, -4.26; 95%CI= -14.05 to 5.53), also with very low certainty of evidence. The results for pulmonary function, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality were imprecise, with very low certainty of evidence. The available evidence also indicates the potential safety benefit of inspiratory muscle training, although the certainty of evidence remains very low. Conclusion: We identified that inspiratory muscle training may improve inspiratory muscle strength, with little to no difference on duration of mechanical ventilation, pulmonary function and severe and non-serious adverse events, when compared to sham inspiratory muscle training and usual care. However, the certainty of the evidence is very low. Evidence regarding the impact of inspiratory muscle training on intensive care unit mortality and length of stay is uncertain. Prospero database registration ID CRD42022370750.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of studies selection
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot of inspiratory muscle strength: inspiratory muscle training versus usual care
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plot of inspiratory muscle strength: inspiratory muscle training versus sham
Figure 1S
Figure 1S. Risk of bias in the included Risk of bias in the included randomized controlled trials
Figure 2S
Figure 2S. Forest plot of subgroup analysis of inspiratory muscle strength based on the number of repetitions per session
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Nelson JE, Cox CE, Hope AA, Carson SS. Chronic critical illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(4):446–454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Damuth E, Mitchell JA, Bartock JL, Roberts BW, Trzeciak S. Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(7):544–553. Review. - PubMed
    1. Carson SS. Definitions and epidemiology of the chronically critically ill. Respir Care. 2012;57(6):848–856. - PubMed
    1. Kahn JM, Le T, Angus DC, Cox CE, Hough CL, White DB, Yende S, Carson SS, ProVent Study Group Investigators The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States*. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(2):282–287. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kandilov A, Ingber M, Morley M, Coomer N, Dalton K, Gage B, et al. Chronically critically ill population payment recommendations (CCIP-PR) RTI International; 2014. [cited 2024 Nov 10]. https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/files/reports/chronicallycriti...

LinkOut - more resources