Dermal absorption, skin retention and urinary elimination of bisphenol S in rats: in vitro, in vivo and intravenous comparative analysis
- PMID: 40699312
- DOI: 10.1007/s00204-025-04138-5
Dermal absorption, skin retention and urinary elimination of bisphenol S in rats: in vitro, in vivo and intravenous comparative analysis
Abstract
Bisphenol S (BPS) is widely used as a substitute for bisphenol A (BPA) in industrial applications, but concerns have been raised about its dermal absorption and potential systemic toxicity. Here, we investigated the toxicokinetics of BPS following dermal and intravenous (i.v.) exposure in rats, and performed complementary in vitro dermal absorption studies. A single dose of 20 µg/cm2 [14C]-BPS was applied (50 µL/cm2) in vitro and in vivo to rat skin. Maximum systemic exposure was achieved by administering 0.05, 0.5, or 5 mg/kg i.v. In vitro percutaneous absorption depended on the solvent, with the highest uptake measured in artificial sebum (~ 5000 ng/cm2 over 40 h). Most absorbed BPS remained unmetabolised (78-85%), with a significant skin reservoir (25-60% of the applied dose). In vivo dermal exposure resulted in low systemic absorption (~ 10%), with BPS persisting in the skin for more than 72 h. The primary excretion route was in urine (60-70%), mainly as BPS-glucuronide. Systemic i.v. exposure confirmed rapid metabolisation, with BPS-G dominating in the plasma and urinary profiles. Applying the Triple-Pack approach, by integrating in vitro and in vivo rat data with prior human in vitro findings, human in vivo dermal absorption was estimated at 1.4% of the applied dose. The results presented highlight prolonged skin retention and slow systemic release of BPS, raising concerns about chronic low-level exposure following dermal contact. Further studies are needed to refine risk assessments, particularly to enhance toxicokinetic modelling and forward dosimetry to improve exposure prediction and regulatory decision-making.
Keywords: Bisphenol S; Dermal absorption; Human exposure estimation; Rat; Toxicokinetics.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Estimation of BPA, BPS, and BPF exposure levels in the general Korean population using the physiologically-based toxicokinetic model and human urinary biomonitoring for risk assessment.Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2025 Jul 28;269:114623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2025.114623. Online ahead of print. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2025. PMID: 40729838
-
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024. PMID: 38993656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Estimation of Dermal Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Feminine Hygiene Products: Integrating Measurement Data and Physiologically Based Toxicokinetic (PBTK) Model.Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun;133(6):67020. doi: 10.1289/EHP15418. Epub 2025 Jun 20. Environ Health Perspect. 2025. PMID: 40344599 Free PMC article.
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085. Epub 2025 Jun 30. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025. PMID: 40583613 Review.
References
-
- Akcetin MO, Gul HK, Goren IE, Daglioglu N, Kurt-Karakus PB (2025) BPA and its analogues in thermal papers: an assessment of presence and dermal exposure. Environ Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4VA00132J - DOI
-
- Allen DG, Rooney J, Kleinstreuer N, Lowit A, Perron M (2021) Retrospective analysis of dermal absorption triple pack data. Altex 38(3):463–476. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2101121 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Beausoleil C, Le Magueresse-Battistoni B, Viguié C et al (2022) Regulatory and academic studies to derive reference values for human health: the case of bisphenol S. Environ Res 204(Part C):112233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112233 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bousoumah R, Leso V, Iavicoli I et al (2021) Biomonitoring of occupational exposure to bisphenol A, bisphenol S and bisphenol F: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ 783:146905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146905 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Catenza CJ, Farooq A, Shubear NS, Donkor KK (2021) A targeted review on fate, occurrence, risk and health implications of bisphenol analogues. Chemosphere 268:129273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129273 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources