Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 23:10.1007/s10552-025-02036-w.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02036-w. Online ahead of print.

Cost of colorectal cancer screening in two tribal health organizations in Alaska

Affiliations

Cost of colorectal cancer screening in two tribal health organizations in Alaska

Florence K L Tangka et al. Cancer Causes Control. .

Abstract

Purpose: We conducted a comprehensive assessment of the resources required to undergo colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in two Alaska Native tribal health organizations.

Methods: We evaluated the cost of CRC screening at Maniilaq Association and Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation, and the communities they serve. We developed a tailored data collection tool to gather data from health clinics. We calculated the cost of screening tests and patient costs. We also conducted interviews with clinic representatives to identify contextual factors that can affect cost estimates.

Results: The cost of fecal immunochemical tests and fecal occult blood tests ranged from $53 to $76. The cost of the colonoscopy procedure ranged from $2,600 to $4,066. Travel costs, including per diem, ranged from $1,561 to $1,740. The cost of missed work was estimated to be $1,008 for patients and medical escorts for both communities. The total cost of receiving a colonoscopy, including procedural costs, travel costs, and the cost of missed work, ranged from $5,348 to $6,635.

Conclusion: We found the cost of the screening tests, travel costs and the cost of missed work to undergo CRC screening were higher in Alaska than national averages. Program planning could benefit from accounting for the costs and additional resources needed in Alaska due to the geography of the state and the location of providers and facilities.

Keywords: Alaska public health; Cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Patient navigation; Program cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: RTI International institutional review board determined that this study was not research involving human subjects.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, White MC, Villarroel MA, Shapiro JA, Croswell JM, et al. Up-to-Date Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use in the United States, 2021. Prev Chronic Dis 2023. 20:E94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanth P, Inadomi JM. Screening and prevention of colorectal cancer. BMJ 2021;374:n1855. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final Recommendation Statement. Colorectal cancer: screening Rockville, MD: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; 2021. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colo....
    1. Haverkamp D, Redwood D, Roik E, Vindigni S, Thomas T. Elevated colorectal cancer incidence among American Indian/Alaska Native persons in Alaska compared to other populations worldwide. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2023;82(1):2184749. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colorectal Cancer Screening. 2024 Alaska Native Health Fact Sheet. 2024. colorectal-cancer-screening-fact-sheet-2024.pdf

LinkOut - more resources